W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-addressing@w3.org > June 2005

RE: Another go at lc75 and lc88 language (correction)

From: Robert Freund <bob.freund@hitachisoftware.com>
Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2005 23:04:06 -0400
To: "'Robert Freund'" <bob.freund@hitachisoftware.com>, <public-ws-addressing@w3.org>
Message-ID: <E1Df7uQ-00058k-77@bart.w3.org>
Change of one MUST to MAY



From: public-ws-addressing-request@w3.org
[mailto:public-ws-addressing-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Robert Freund
Sent: Sunday, June 05, 2005 10:59 PM
To: public-ws-addressing@w3.org
Subject: Another go at lc75 and lc88 language


Note that I have not attempted to address the comments on this list
concerning time stamp or other complex type proposals since they are beyond
the scope of the lc comments.



The value of [message id] uniquely identifies the message.

When present, it is the responsibility of the sender to insure that each
message is uniquely identified.

A receiver MAY treat all messages that contain the same [message id] as the
same message.

If a reply is expected and a back-channel may not be available, [message id]
MUST be present.

No specific algorithm for the generation of unique values of [message id] is
given, however methods such as the use of an IRI that exists within a domain
owned by the sender combined with a sequence satisfies the uniqueness
criteria but may not be the best practice from a security perspective.
Received on Monday, 6 June 2005 03:04:15 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:04:09 UTC