W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-addressing@w3.org > June 2005

RE: Another go at lc75 and lc88 language (correction)

From: Robert Freund <bob.freund@hitachisoftware.com>
Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2005 23:04:06 -0400
To: "'Robert Freund'" <bob.freund@hitachisoftware.com>, <public-ws-addressing@w3.org>
Message-ID: <E1Df7uQ-00058k-77@bart.w3.org>
Change of one MUST to MAY

 

  _____  

From: public-ws-addressing-request@w3.org
[mailto:public-ws-addressing-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Robert Freund
Sent: Sunday, June 05, 2005 10:59 PM
To: public-ws-addressing@w3.org
Subject: Another go at lc75 and lc88 language

 

Note that I have not attempted to address the comments on this list
concerning time stamp or other complex type proposals since they are beyond
the scope of the lc comments.

-bob

 

The value of [message id] uniquely identifies the message.

When present, it is the responsibility of the sender to insure that each
message is uniquely identified.

A receiver MAY treat all messages that contain the same [message id] as the
same message.

If a reply is expected and a back-channel may not be available, [message id]
MUST be present.

No specific algorithm for the generation of unique values of [message id] is
given, however methods such as the use of an IRI that exists within a domain
owned by the sender combined with a sequence satisfies the uniqueness
criteria but may not be the best practice from a security perspective.
Received on Monday, 6 June 2005 03:04:15 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:35:05 GMT