W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-addressing@w3.org > August 2005

RE: fabrikam?

From: Abbie Barbir <abbieb@nortel.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2005 14:23:44 -0400
Message-ID: <87AC5F88F03E6249AEA68D40BD3E00BE051BC422@zcarhxm2.corp.nortel.com>
To: "Rich Salz" <rsalz@datapower.com>, <tim@mindreef.com>
Cc: <public-ws-addressing@w3.org>

Yes,
they do work.
abbie
> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-ws-addressing-request@w3.org 
> [mailto:public-ws-addressing-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Rich Salz
> Sent: Monday, August 15, 2005 2:16 PM
> To: tim@mindreef.com
> Cc: public-ws-addressing@w3.org
> Subject: Re: fabrikam?
> 
> 
> 
> > I think the limitation of example.com is that in a lot of cases you 
> > want to show URIs from multiple entities participating in an 
> > interchange. From a pedagogical perspective, I think it's easier to 
> > understand examples that use other domain names.
> 
> This is a good point.  I wonder if sub-domains (customer.example.com, 
> home-office.example.com, etc) works?
> 
> 	/r$
> 
> -- 
> Rich Salz, Chief Security Architect
> DataPower Technology                           
> http://www.datapower.com
> XS40 XML Security Gateway   
> http://www.datapower.com/products/xs40.html
> 
> 
> 
Received on Monday, 15 August 2005 18:22:42 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:35:08 GMT