W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-addressing@w3.org > August 2005

RE: fabrikam?

From: Tim Ewald <tim@mindreef.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2005 14:31:14 -0400
To: "'Christopher B Ferris'" <chrisfer@us.ibm.com>, "'Rich Salz'" <rsalz@datapower.com>
Cc: <public-ws-addressing@w3.org>, <public-ws-addressing-request@w3.org>
Message-ID: <E1E4jk2-0001a5-VB@maggie.w3.org>

Makes sense to me.

Tim- 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Christopher B Ferris [mailto:chrisfer@us.ibm.com] 
> Sent: Monday, August 15, 2005 2:21 PM
> To: Rich Salz
> Cc: public-ws-addressing@w3.org; 
> public-ws-addressing-request@w3.org; tim@mindreef.com
> Subject: Re: fabrikam?
> 
> I believe that subdomains would be consistent with RFC2606.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Christopher Ferris
> STSM, Emerging e-business Industry Architecture
> email: chrisfer@us.ibm.com
> blog: http://webpages.charter.net/chrisfer/blog.html
> phone: +1 508 377 9295
> 
> public-ws-addressing-request@w3.org wrote on 08/15/2005 02:15:46 PM:
> 
> > 
> > > I think the limitation of example.com is that in a lot of 
> cases you
> want to
> > > show URIs from multiple entities participating in an interchange. 
> > > From
> a
> > > pedagogical perspective, I think it's easier to 
> understand examples
> that use
> > > other domain names.
> > 
> > This is a good point.  I wonder if sub-domains 
> (customer.example.com, 
> > home-office.example.com, etc) works?
> > 
> >    /r$
> > 
> > --
> > Rich Salz, Chief Security Architect
> > DataPower Technology                           
> http://www.datapower.com
> > XS40 XML Security Gateway   
> http://www.datapower.com/products/xs40.html
> > 
> 
> 
Received on Monday, 15 August 2005 18:31:26 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:35:08 GMT