- From: Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2005 14:20:45 -0400
- To: Rich Salz <rsalz@datapower.com>
- Cc: public-ws-addressing@w3.org, public-ws-addressing-request@w3.org, tim@mindreef.com
I believe that subdomains would be consistent with RFC2606. Cheers, Christopher Ferris STSM, Emerging e-business Industry Architecture email: chrisfer@us.ibm.com blog: http://webpages.charter.net/chrisfer/blog.html phone: +1 508 377 9295 public-ws-addressing-request@w3.org wrote on 08/15/2005 02:15:46 PM: > > > I think the limitation of example.com is that in a lot of cases you want to > > show URIs from multiple entities participating in an interchange. From a > > pedagogical perspective, I think it's easier to understand examples that use > > other domain names. > > This is a good point. I wonder if sub-domains (customer.example.com, > home-office.example.com, etc) works? > > /r$ > > -- > Rich Salz, Chief Security Architect > DataPower Technology http://www.datapower.com > XS40 XML Security Gateway http://www.datapower.com/products/xs40.html >
Received on Monday, 15 August 2005 18:21:02 UTC