W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-addressing@w3.org > August 2005

Re: fabrikam?

From: Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2005 14:20:45 -0400
To: Rich Salz <rsalz@datapower.com>
Cc: public-ws-addressing@w3.org, public-ws-addressing-request@w3.org, tim@mindreef.com
Message-ID: <OF51B2A08B.EF963888-ON8525705E.00646297-8525705E.0064C6D0@us.ibm.com>

I believe that subdomains would be consistent with RFC2606.

Cheers,

Christopher Ferris
STSM, Emerging e-business Industry Architecture
email: chrisfer@us.ibm.com
blog: http://webpages.charter.net/chrisfer/blog.html
phone: +1 508 377 9295

public-ws-addressing-request@w3.org wrote on 08/15/2005 02:15:46 PM:

> 
> > I think the limitation of example.com is that in a lot of cases you 
want to
> > show URIs from multiple entities participating in an interchange. From 
a
> > pedagogical perspective, I think it's easier to understand examples 
that use
> > other domain names.
> 
> This is a good point.  I wonder if sub-domains (customer.example.com, 
> home-office.example.com, etc) works?
> 
>    /r$
> 
> -- 
> Rich Salz, Chief Security Architect
> DataPower Technology                           http://www.datapower.com
> XS40 XML Security Gateway   http://www.datapower.com/products/xs40.html
> 
Received on Monday, 15 August 2005 18:21:02 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:35:08 GMT