W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-addressing@w3.org > April 2005

Re: Typo?

From: Marc Hadley <Marc.Hadley@Sun.COM>
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 09:14:25 -0400
To: "Srinivas, Davanum M" <Davanum.Srinivas@ca.com>
Cc: public-ws-addressing@w3.org
Message-id: <49150b264fc661ce3a2ecd035710450e@Sun.COM>

I think we need to show the metadata element with some content. The 
wsaw:InterfaceName is there as an example of metadata content that we 
define, I guess we could replace the <wsaw:InterfaceName> with ... but 
I don't really see the harm in including something from the WSDL 
binding doc.

Marc.

On Apr 11, 2005, at 6:39 PM, Srinivas, Davanum M wrote:

>
> Guess it's a layering question. We refer to wsaw in the following
> places:
>
> - Table 1-1 which lists the namespaces
> - Text in 1.2 which says ("WS-Addressing may be used with WSDL [WSDL
> 2.0] described services as described in Web Services Addressing 1.0 -
> WSDL Binding")
> - Example 3-1
>    <wsa:Metadata>
>        <wsaw:InterfaceName>fabrikam:Inventory</wsaw:InterfaceName>
>    <wsa:Metadata>
> - Section 7 - Reference
>
> I guess my question is, do we really need to refer to wsaw in the "SOAP
> Binding" document? JUST because we use it in the example? (or am I
> missing something obvious)
>
> Thanks,
> dims
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Marc.Hadley@Sun.COM [mailto:Marc.Hadley@Sun.COM]
> Sent: Monday, April 11, 2005 5:48 PM
> To: Srinivas, Davanum M
> Cc: public-ws-addressing@w3.org
> Subject: Re: Typo?
>
> On Apr 11, 2005, at 5:00 PM, Srinivas, Davanum M wrote:
>>
>> Was reviewing the Editors draft and ran into example 3-1 in SOAP
>> Binding...Should we get rid of
>> "<wsaw:InterfaceName>fabrikam:Inventory</wsaw:InterfaceName>" from
>> that example?
>>
> Why do you want to get rid of it ?
>
> Marc.
>
> ---
> Marc Hadley <marc.hadley at sun.com>
> Business Alliances, CTO Office, Sun Microsystems.
>
>
>
>
>
---
Marc Hadley <marc.hadley at sun.com>
Business Alliances, CTO Office, Sun Microsystems.
Received on Tuesday, 12 April 2005 13:14:29 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:35:05 GMT