W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-addressing@w3.org > April 2005

Editorial stuff for Core Spec

From: Srinivas, Davanum M <Davanum.Srinivas@ca.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 12:58:07 -0400
Message-ID: <87527035FDD42A428221FA578D4A9A5B09841422@usilms24.ca.com>
To: <public-ws-addressing@w3.org>

Hi Marc/Editors,

#1: In the core spec Section 3 and Section 3.1 can we change the order
of the Abstract Properties and the XML Infoset representation to be the
same? For example " [destination] : IRI (mandatory)" is first in Section
3, but Section 3.1 has "/wsa:MessageID"...just to make things

#2: In "3.2 Formulating a Reply Message" should we say something about
wsa:Metadata? (or is it just implied that it is ignored/consumed)

#3: Example 3-1 in core spec has an extra "?" 
<wsa:RelatesTo RelationshipType="..."?>xs:anyURI</wsa:RelatesTo>

#4: Table 1-1 lists S11, but S11 is not used in the doc. Should we
remove it from table 1-1? And related observation is that the text does
not say anything about SOAP 1.1 (it just says - "WS-Addressing may be
used with SOAP [SOAP 1.2 Part 1: Messaging Framework] as described in
Web Services Addressing 1.0 - SOAP Binding[WS-Addressing-SOAP]."). 

#5: Some URL's in References are bad. They have an extra '.'
	[IETF RFC 2119] - 2nd URL
	[WSDL 2.0] - 2nd URL
	[XML 1.0] - 2nd URL
	[XML Namespaces] - 2nd and 4th URL
      [XML Information Set] - 2nd and 4th URL
	[XML Schema Structures] - 2nd URL and 4th URL
      [XML Schema Datatypes] - 2nd and 4th URL

#6: Section 4 Security Considerations has a typo? (" message level
signature, and use of an XML digital signature") should the "and" be
replaced with an "or"?

#7: Should "Table 3-1. Predefined [relationship] values" say "Table 3-1.
Predefined [relationship] types"?


Davanum Srinivas
Computer Associates
Senior Architect, Web Services Group
Tel: +1 508 628 8251
Received on Tuesday, 12 April 2005 16:58:08 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:04:09 UTC