RE: i0001: EPRs as identifiers (why XML?)

Hey Paul,
 

> > Actually while I'm on the subject: why does WSDL keep cropping up 
> > in this WG? Addresses and interfaces are chalk and cheese.
> 
> well, we are chartered to deliver WSDL 1.1 and WSDL 2.0 bindings ..

:-) Fair enough. I'm not entirely sure that makes a great deal of sense,
but if it's in the charter it must be right...

> yay! let's reinvent the whole 7 layer model in XML in layer 7 :-|

Er, no. Let's not. I'm just saying let's standardise on an addressing
format that all SOAP messages can use. That's not tantamount to
reinventing a whole network stack, just bringing SOAP up to the same
degree of functionality as say HTTP or IIOP.

Jim