- From: John Fuller <jfuller@wernervas.com>
- Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 06:14:47 -0600
- To: <public-ws-addressing@w3.org> <public-ws-addressing@w3.org> <public-ws-addressing@w3.org>
I think the usage cases provided for Endpoint References at the beginning of section 2 suggest they provide a way to specify how to talk to/about dynamically created resources (ex: service instances), and it seems like wsdl provides a way to describe how to talk to services... On Nov 24, 2004, at 3:32 AM, Jim Webber wrote: > > Hey Paul, > > >>> Actually while I'm on the subject: why does WSDL keep cropping up >>> in this WG? Addresses and interfaces are chalk and cheese. >> >> well, we are chartered to deliver WSDL 1.1 and WSDL 2.0 bindings .. > > :-) Fair enough. I'm not entirely sure that makes a great deal of > sense, > but if it's in the charter it must be right... > >> yay! let's reinvent the whole 7 layer model in XML in layer 7 :-| > > Er, no. Let's not. I'm just saying let's standardise on an addressing > format that all SOAP messages can use. That's not tantamount to > reinventing a whole network stack, just bringing SOAP up to the same > degree of functionality as say HTTP or IIOP. > > Jim >
Received on Wednesday, 24 November 2004 13:34:12 UTC