W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-addressing@w3.org > November 2004

Re: i0001: EPRs as identifiers (why XML?)

From: John Fuller <jfuller@wernervas.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 06:14:47 -0600
Message-Id: <6F307598-3E12-11D9-8F2A-000393B3C0BA@wernervas.com>
To: <public-ws-addressing@w3.org> <public-ws-addressing@w3.org> <public-ws-addressing@w3.org>

I think the usage cases provided for Endpoint References at the 
beginning of section 2
suggest they provide a way to specify how to talk to/about dynamically 
created resources
(ex: service instances),
and it seems like wsdl provides a way to describe how to talk to 

On Nov 24, 2004, at 3:32 AM, Jim Webber wrote:

> Hey Paul,
>>> Actually while I'm on the subject: why does WSDL keep cropping up
>>> in this WG? Addresses and interfaces are chalk and cheese.
>> well, we are chartered to deliver WSDL 1.1 and WSDL 2.0 bindings ..
> :-) Fair enough. I'm not entirely sure that makes a great deal of 
> sense,
> but if it's in the charter it must be right...
>> yay! let's reinvent the whole 7 layer model in XML in layer 7 :-|
> Er, no. Let's not. I'm just saying let's standardise on an addressing
> format that all SOAP messages can use. That's not tantamount to
> reinventing a whole network stack, just bringing SOAP up to the same
> degree of functionality as say HTTP or IIOP.
> Jim
Received on Wednesday, 24 November 2004 13:34:12 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:04:07 UTC