W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-addressing@w3.org > November 2004

Re: Why FaultTo?

From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2004 15:59:29 -0500
To: Mark Little <mark.little@arjuna.com>
Cc: public-ws-addressing@w3.org
Message-ID: <20041111205928.GG12055@markbaker.ca>

Thanks Mark, that's just the kind of example I was looking for.

On Thu, Nov 11, 2004 at 08:49:36PM +0000, Mark Little wrote:
> +1
> 
> Also, atomic transaction systems often have heuristic decisions 
> (specific types of faults that occur after the transaction terminator 
> has received the official commit/rollback response) delivered to a 
> different endpoint. In this case it may be because the originator of 
> the commit/rollback response has gone away (legitimately and not 
> because of some error in the application), and/or to ensure that a 
> separate failure recovery subsystem can deal with them later.
> 
> Mark.
Received on Thursday, 11 November 2004 20:57:19 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:34:59 GMT