W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-addressing@w3.org > November 2004

RE: Why FaultTo?

From: Martin Gudgin <mgudgin@microsoft.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2004 12:36:19 -0800
Message-ID: <DD35CC66F54D8248B6E04232892B633803EDBD9F@RED-MSG-43.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: "Mark Baker" <distobj@acm.org>
Cc: <public-ws-addressing@w3.org>

Err, wanting to use WS-Addressing to send messages in such a system?

Is this a trick question?

Gudge

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mark Baker [mailto:distobj@acm.org] 
> Sent: 11 November 2004 20:35
> To: Martin Gudgin
> Cc: public-ws-addressing@w3.org
> Subject: Re: Why FaultTo?
> 
> Thanks Gudge, that's prior art.  But what's the use case?
> 
> On Thu, Nov 11, 2004 at 12:23:17PM -0800, Martin Gudgin wrote:
> > There are systems out there that do exactly that. For example, in
> > message queuing systems, error messages are often sent to a specific
> > queue.
> > 
> > Gudge
> 
Received on Thursday, 11 November 2004 20:36:39 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:34:59 GMT