W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-addressing@w3.org > November 2004

Re: Why FaultTo?

From: Sanjiva Weerawarana <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2004 02:44:36 +0600
Message-ID: <012401c4c82f$426c7a00$64c83109@LANKABOOK>
To: "Martin Gudgin" <mgudgin@microsoft.com>, "Mark Baker" <distobj@acm.org>
Cc: <public-ws-addressing@w3.org>

No Gudge he's saying you can't patent it ;-). Damn, too bad.

Sanjiva.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Martin Gudgin" <mgudgin@microsoft.com>
To: "Mark Baker" <distobj@acm.org>
Cc: <public-ws-addressing@w3.org>
Sent: Friday, November 12, 2004 2:36 AM
Subject: RE: Why FaultTo?


> 
> Err, wanting to use WS-Addressing to send messages in such a system?
> 
> Is this a trick question?
> 
> Gudge
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Mark Baker [mailto:distobj@acm.org] 
> > Sent: 11 November 2004 20:35
> > To: Martin Gudgin
> > Cc: public-ws-addressing@w3.org
> > Subject: Re: Why FaultTo?
> > 
> > Thanks Gudge, that's prior art.  But what's the use case?
> > 
> > On Thu, Nov 11, 2004 at 12:23:17PM -0800, Martin Gudgin wrote:
> > > There are systems out there that do exactly that. For example, in
> > > message queuing systems, error messages are often sent to a specific
> > > queue.
> > > 
> > > Gudge
> >
Received on Thursday, 11 November 2004 20:45:18 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:34:59 GMT