W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-addressing@w3.org > November 2004

Re: NEW ISSUE

From: Mark Nottingham <mark.nottingham@bea.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2004 08:31:02 -0500
Message-Id: <F00FF9E0-2F2E-11D9-95F2-000A95BD86C0@bea.com>
Cc: public-ws-addressing@w3.org
To: Mark Little <mark.little@arjuna.com>

Hi Mark,

Can we consider this as part of i017, or is it really separate?

> i017 Purpose of the Action property
> Why is it neccessary to be able to specify a non-default Action? Why 
> are non-unique Action headers allowed? What is the relationship 
> between the  action value and the operation name?

(Also, please include a description of the issue along with "NEW 
ISSUE"; otherwise, we'll just have a monster "NEW ISSUE" thread. :)

Cheers,


On Nov 5, 2004, at 3:41 AM, Mark Little wrote:

> Not exactly sure of the wording you'd require, but here goes:
>
> I'd like to propose raising a new issue on the utility of wsa:Action 
> and its presence in a specification about addressing.
>
> Mark.
>
>
> ----
> Mark Little,
> Chief Architect,
> Arjuna Technologies Ltd.
>
> www.arjuna.com
>
>

--
Mark Nottingham   Principal Technologist
Office of the CTO   BEA Systems
Received on Friday, 5 November 2004 13:31:23 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:34:59 GMT