W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-addressing@w3.org > November 2004

Re: Raising issues

From: Mark Nottingham <mark.nottingham@bea.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2004 08:39:06 -0500
Message-Id: <108C4A15-2F30-11D9-95F2-000A95BD86C0@bea.com>
To: public-ws-addressing@w3.org

Also, for the benefit of those not at the F2F;

To help focus the process, issues need to include;

* Title - A short descriptive name for the issue
* Description - A longer and complete description of the issue, state 
in terms of the documents
* Justification - Why is this an issue? E.g., state an architectural 
concern, demonstrate an interop problem, explain a use case that isn't 
* Target - What specification the issue is against (core | soap | wsdl )
* Proposal - A reasonably complete proposal for how the issue should be 

I haven't been requiring all of this information (e.g., justifications 
and proposals) in the start-up process of the WG, to enable people to 
submit their issues quickly. However, moving forward, I'd like new 
issue proposals to include all of this information. This will help us 
meet our schedule and help to avoid confusion about the nature of new 

I'll get this information onto the WG page for future reference.


On Nov 4, 2004, at 5:27 PM, Mark Nottingham wrote:

> If you'd like to raise a new issue on this list, please identify it 
> with 'NEW ISSUE' in the Subject: header; e.g., "NEW ISSUE: Foo should 
> be Bar". Separate issues should be raised in separate e-mails.
> New issues will be added to the issues list for the WG's 
> consideration, as long as they're not obviously out of scope or a 
> duplicate of an existing issue.
> Thanks,
> --
> Mark Nottingham   Principal Technologist
> Office of the CTO   BEA Systems

Mark Nottingham   Principal Technologist
Office of the CTO   BEA Systems
Received on Friday, 5 November 2004 13:39:10 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:04:07 UTC