W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-addressing@w3.org > December 2004

Re: i0001: EPRs as identifiers - alternative proposal

From: Sanjiva Weerawarana <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2004 16:45:21 +0600
Message-ID: <0d5801c4dc49$db1e0ec0$794d4109@LANKABOOK>
To: "David Booth" <dbooth@w3.org>, "Francisco Curbera" <curbera@us.ibm.com>
Cc: <public-ws-addressing@w3.org>

Hi David,

How can one worry about how this stuff is used .. people are using
cookies to identify stuff too but do we worry about that? There's
nothing you can do about it; so, don't worry, be happy.

I'd say the same applies here; there's an architected role for them
and there are all kinds of (ab)uses that people will do. Ain't nothin'
we can do about that.


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "David Booth" <dbooth@w3.org>
To: "Francisco Curbera" <curbera@us.ibm.com>
Cc: <public-ws-addressing@w3.org>
Sent: Tuesday, December 07, 2004 3:28 PM
Subject: Re: i0001: EPRs as identifiers - alternative proposal

> Paco,
> The issue is not about how Reference Properties are described.  The
> issue is about how they are *used*.  Calling them "addresses" instead of
> "identifiers" changes nothing.
> -- 
> David Booth
> W3C Fellow / Hewlett-Packard
Received on Tuesday, 7 December 2004 10:46:01 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:04:07 UTC