W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-addressing@w3.org > December 2004

Re: i0001: EPRs as identifiers - alternative proposal

From: David Booth <dbooth@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2004 04:28:09 -0500
To: Francisco Curbera <curbera@us.ibm.com>
Cc: public-ws-addressing@w3.org
Message-Id: <1102411666.3465.299.camel@nc6000.w3.org>


Paco,

The issue is not about how Reference Properties are described.  The
issue is about how they are *used*.  Calling them "addresses" instead of
"identifiers" changes nothing.

-- 

David Booth
W3C Fellow / Hewlett-Packard

Received on Tuesday, 7 December 2004 09:28:22 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Sanjiva Weerawarana: "Re: i0001: EPRs as identifiers - alternative proposal"
Previous message: David Booth: "Re: i001: EPRs as identifiers: update to EPR pros and cons by adding ref prop scenario"
In reply to: Francisco Curbera: "i0001: EPRs as identifiers - alternative proposal"
Next in thread: Sanjiva Weerawarana: "Re: i0001: EPRs as identifiers - alternative proposal"
Reply: Sanjiva Weerawarana: "Re: i0001: EPRs as identifiers - alternative proposal"
Reply: Francisco Curbera: "Re: i0001: EPRs as identifiers - alternative proposal"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:35:00 GMT