W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-addressing-tests@w3.org > March 2006

Re: Additional assertions for 1150 and 1250

From: Mark Little <mark.little@jboss.com>
Date: Sat, 04 Mar 2006 18:21:29 +0000
Message-ID: <4409DAA9.6060901@jboss.com>
To: David Illsley <david.illsley@uk.ibm.com>
CC: public-ws-addressing-tests@w3.org

I agree.

Mark.


David Illsley wrote:
>
> Hi all,
> I've been reviewing a problem with the IBM client which has problems 
> with one of the implementations which doesn't send a RelatesTo on a 
> non-anonymous response. (I've followed up on this off-list)
> It's important that this header be there (pretty fundamental in an 
> async model) and isn't currently caught by an assertion so I propose 
> adding the relevant assertions from 1130 and 1230 to 1150 and 1250 to 
> make sure that the RelatesTo is there e.g.
>
>             <assert test="soap11:Envelope/soap11:Header/wsa:RelatesTo 
> = ../preceding-sibling::log:message[@testcase=current()/../@testcase 
> and 
> @message='1']/log:content/soap11:Envelope/soap11:Header/wsa:MessageID"/>
>             <assert 
> test="not(soap11:Envelope/soap11:Header/wsa:RelatesTo/@RelationshipType) 
> or soap11:Envelope/soap11:Header/wsa:RelatesTo/@RelationshipType = 
> 'http://www.w3.org/2005/08/addressing/reply'"/>
>
> This is in my opinion important enough to add even at this late stage 
> in the game.
>
> Thoughts?
> David
>
> David Illsley
> Web Services Development
> MP127, IBM Hursley Park, SO21 2JN
> +44 (0)1962 815049 (Int. 245049)
> david.illsley@uk.ibm.com 
Received on Saturday, 4 March 2006 18:21:15 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 19:54:42 UTC