W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-addressing-tests@w3.org > March 2006

Re: Additional assertions for 1150 and 1250

From: Arun Gupta <Arun.Gupta@Sun.COM>
Date: Sat, 04 Mar 2006 22:25:17 -0800
To: David Illsley <david.illsley@uk.ibm.com>
Cc: public-ws-addressing-tests@w3.org
Message-id: <440A844D.40200@sun.com>

+1

I think this is a fundamental check.

-Arun

David Illsley wrote:
> 
> Hi all,
> I've been reviewing a problem with the IBM client which has problems 
> with one of the implementations which doesn't send a RelatesTo on a 
> non-anonymous response. (I've followed up on this off-list)
> It's important that this header be there (pretty fundamental in an async 
> model) and isn't currently caught by an assertion so I propose adding 
> the relevant assertions from 1130 and 1230 to 1150 and 1250 to make sure 
> that the RelatesTo is there e.g.
> 
>             <assert test="soap11:Envelope/soap11:Header/wsa:RelatesTo = 
> ../preceding-sibling::log:message[@testcase=current()/../@testcase and 
> @message='1']/log:content/soap11:Envelope/soap11:Header/wsa:MessageID"/>
>             <assert 
> test="not(soap11:Envelope/soap11:Header/wsa:RelatesTo/@RelationshipType) 
> or soap11:Envelope/soap11:Header/wsa:RelatesTo/@RelationshipType = 
> 'http://www.w3.org/2005/08/addressing/reply'"/>
> 
> This is in my opinion important enough to add even at this late stage in 
> the game.
> 
> Thoughts?
> David
> 
> David Illsley
> Web Services Development
> MP127, IBM Hursley Park, SO21 2JN
> +44 (0)1962 815049 (Int. 245049)
> david.illsley@uk.ibm.com

-- 
got Web Services ?
Download Java Web Services Developer Pack from
http://java.sun.com/webservices
Received on Sunday, 5 March 2006 06:23:36 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 19:54:42 UTC