W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-addressing-tests@w3.org > March 2006

Re: Mostly red report

From: Arun Gupta <Arun.Gupta@Sun.COM>
Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2006 09:11:20 -0800
To: David Illsley <david.illsley@uk.ibm.com>
Cc: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>, WS-Addressing Tests <public-ws-addressing-tests@w3.org>, public-ws-addressing-tests-request@w3.org
Message-id: <44072738.9060207@sun.com>

test1147 for IBM->Sun and Microsoft->Sun is now fixed and endpoints 
updated.

I dont have an easy way to test1147 and test1248 for Sun->Sun. Can that 
be updated in the stylesheet to reflect that ?

I sent a separate mail about test1251 and still looking for an 
explanation there before I implement it.

-Arun

David Illsley wrote:
> 
> Looks  better :-)
> 
> ...but maybe not quite right (Microsoft -> Sun is failing 'cos of a lack 
> of a message 2 in 1251 and message 2 shouldn't be required for 1251).
> 
> I think the following should fix it so that only message elements in the 
> testcases.xml which have associated assertions become required.
> 
> In mkschema.xsl:
> 
>                                                 <xsl:if test="$num!=1">
>                                                         <xsl:if 
> test="count(./s:assert)>0">
>                                                                 
> <sch:rule context="log:message[@testcase='{$testcase}'][@message='1']">
>                                                                         
> <sch:assert 
> test="following-sibling::log:message[@testcase='{$testcase}'][@message='{$num}']">assertion 
> "all required messages present" against <xsl:value-of 
> select="$testcase"/> message <xsl:value-of select="$num"/> 
> failed</sch:assert>
>                                                                 </sch:rule>
>                                                         </xsl:if>        
>                                                 </xsl:if>
> 
> This makes the IBM->Sun failure on 1251 show up and also that the 
> Microsoft logs need some renumbering but I don't think it throws up any 
> red we aren't expecting?
> 
> I'll generate new reports against those who have asked this evening 
> (it's easier to do at home because of firewall issues).
> 
> Cheers,
> David
> 
> David Illsley
> Web Services Development
> MP127, IBM Hursley Park, SO21 2JN
> +44 (0)1962 815049 (Int. 245049)
> david.illsley@uk.ibm.com
> 
> 
> *"Jonathan Marsh" <jmarsh@microsoft.com>*
> Sent by: public-ws-addressing-tests-request@w3.org
> 
> 02/03/2006 14:50
> 
> 	
> To
> 	"Arun Gupta" <Arun.Gupta@Sun.COM>, "WS-Addressing Tests" 
> <public-ws-addressing-tests@w3.org>
> cc
> 	
> Subject
> 	RE: Mostly red report
> 
> 
> 	
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> My bad, my fix for the "missing message" case caused a side effect.
> Checked in a version I'm more confident in.  The next rebuild will tell.
> 
> 
>  > -----Original Message-----
>  > From: public-ws-addressing-tests-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ws-
>  > addressing-tests-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Arun Gupta
>  > Sent: Thursday, March 02, 2006 5:51 AM
>  > To: WS-Addressing Tests
>  > Subject: Mostly red report
>  >
>  >
>  > The report (dated Thu Mar 2 13:08:37 2006 UTC) turned from mostly
> green
>  > to mostly red. It anybody investigating that ?
>  >
>  > -Arun
>  > --
>  > got Web Services ?
>  > Download Java Web Services Developer Pack from
>  > http://java.sun.com/webservices
> 
> 
> 

-- 
got Web Services ?
Download Java Web Services Developer Pack from
http://java.sun.com/webservices
Received on Thursday, 2 March 2006 17:09:45 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 19:54:42 UTC