W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-addressing-tests@w3.org > March 2006

RE: Mostly red report

From: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 09:18:39 -0800
Message-ID: <37D0366A39A9044286B2783EB4C3C4E801CAA1AE@RED-MSG-10.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: "Arun Gupta" <Arun.Gupta@Sun.COM>, "David Illsley" <david.illsley@uk.ibm.com>
Cc: "WS-Addressing Tests" <public-ws-addressing-tests@w3.org>, <public-ws-addressing-tests-request@w3.org>

We just updated the results again:

Added a new log from Glen running the Microsoft public client against
the Axis endpoint.  51% pass, rest aren't getting enough debug
information to figure out what's going on.

Added 2 WSO2 logs.

Tried to fix the problem of ensuring each test has the right number of
messages.   Still some strange behavior around 1251 on Sun though to
investigate.

Sun logs don't get past 1234...

We will remove tests 1145 and 1245 tomorrow, per WG decisions.  Also
1260 will likely be dropped or moved to INFORMATIVE.



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Arun Gupta [mailto:Arun.Gupta@Sun.COM]
> Sent: Thursday, March 02, 2006 9:11 AM
> To: David Illsley
> Cc: Jonathan Marsh; WS-Addressing Tests; public-ws-addressing-tests-
> request@w3.org
> Subject: Re: Mostly red report
> 
> test1147 for IBM->Sun and Microsoft->Sun is now fixed and endpoints
> updated.
> 
> I dont have an easy way to test1147 and test1248 for Sun->Sun. Can
that
> be updated in the stylesheet to reflect that ?
> 
> I sent a separate mail about test1251 and still looking for an
> explanation there before I implement it.
> 
> -Arun
> 
> David Illsley wrote:
> >
> > Looks  better :-)
> >
> > ...but maybe not quite right (Microsoft -> Sun is failing 'cos of a
lack
> > of a message 2 in 1251 and message 2 shouldn't be required for
1251).
> >
> > I think the following should fix it so that only message elements in
the
> > testcases.xml which have associated assertions become required.
> >
> > In mkschema.xsl:
> >
> >                                                 <xsl:if
test="$num!=1">
> >                                                         <xsl:if
> > test="count(./s:assert)>0">
> >
> > <sch:rule
context="log:message[@testcase='{$testcase}'][@message='1']">
> >
> > <sch:assert
> > test="following-
>
sibling::log:message[@testcase='{$testcase}'][@message='{$num}']">assert
io
> n
> > "all required messages present" against <xsl:value-of
> > select="$testcase"/> message <xsl:value-of select="$num"/>
> > failed</sch:assert>
> >
> </sch:rule>
> >                                                         </xsl:if>
> >                                                 </xsl:if>
> >
> > This makes the IBM->Sun failure on 1251 show up and also that the
> > Microsoft logs need some renumbering but I don't think it throws up
any
> > red we aren't expecting?
> >
> > I'll generate new reports against those who have asked this evening
> > (it's easier to do at home because of firewall issues).
> >
> > Cheers,
> > David
> >
> > David Illsley
> > Web Services Development
> > MP127, IBM Hursley Park, SO21 2JN
> > +44 (0)1962 815049 (Int. 245049)
> > david.illsley@uk.ibm.com
> >
> >
> > *"Jonathan Marsh" <jmarsh@microsoft.com>*
> > Sent by: public-ws-addressing-tests-request@w3.org
> >
> > 02/03/2006 14:50
> >
> >
> > To
> > 	"Arun Gupta" <Arun.Gupta@Sun.COM>, "WS-Addressing Tests"
> > <public-ws-addressing-tests@w3.org>
> > cc
> >
> > Subject
> > 	RE: Mostly red report
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > My bad, my fix for the "missing message" case caused a side effect.
> > Checked in a version I'm more confident in.  The next rebuild will
tell.
> >
> >
> >  > -----Original Message-----
> >  > From: public-ws-addressing-tests-request@w3.org
[mailto:public-ws-
> >  > addressing-tests-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Arun Gupta
> >  > Sent: Thursday, March 02, 2006 5:51 AM
> >  > To: WS-Addressing Tests
> >  > Subject: Mostly red report
> >  >
> >  >
> >  > The report (dated Thu Mar 2 13:08:37 2006 UTC) turned from mostly
> > green
> >  > to mostly red. It anybody investigating that ?
> >  >
> >  > -Arun
> >  > --
> >  > got Web Services ?
> >  > Download Java Web Services Developer Pack from
> >  > http://java.sun.com/webservices
> >
> >
> >
> 
> --
> got Web Services ?
> Download Java Web Services Developer Pack from
> http://java.sun.com/webservices
Received on Thursday, 2 March 2006 17:18:55 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 19:54:42 UTC