W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-addressing-tests@w3.org > March 2006

RE: Mostly red report

From: David Illsley <david.illsley@uk.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 16:28:33 +0000
To: "Jonathan Marsh" <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
Cc: "Arun Gupta" <Arun.Gupta@Sun.COM>, "WS-Addressing Tests" <public-ws-addressing-tests@w3.org>, public-ws-addressing-tests-request@w3.org
Message-ID: <OFE6A892C2.0B443897-ON80257125.0059A046-80257125.005A7BC0@uk.ibm.com>
Looks  better :-)

...but maybe not quite right (Microsoft -> Sun is failing 'cos of a lack 
of a message 2 in 1251 and message 2 shouldn't be required for 1251).

I think the following should fix it so that only message elements in the 
testcases.xml which have associated assertions become required.

In mkschema.xsl:

                                                <xsl:if test="$num!=1">
                                                        <xsl:if 
test="count(./s:assert)>0">
                                                                <sch:rule 
context="log:message[@testcase='{$testcase}'][@message='1']">
 <sch:assert 
test="following-sibling::log:message[@testcase='{$testcase}'][@message='{$num}']">assertion 
"all required messages present" against <xsl:value-of select="$testcase"/> 
message <xsl:value-of select="$num"/> failed</sch:assert>
 </sch:rule>
                                                        </xsl:if> 
                                                </xsl:if>

This makes the IBM->Sun failure on 1251 show up and also that the 
Microsoft logs need some renumbering but I don't think it throws up any 
red we aren't expecting?

I'll generate new reports against those who have asked this evening (it's 
easier to do at home because of firewall issues).

Cheers,
David

David Illsley
Web Services Development
MP127, IBM Hursley Park, SO21 2JN
+44 (0)1962 815049 (Int. 245049)
david.illsley@uk.ibm.com



"Jonathan Marsh" <jmarsh@microsoft.com> 
Sent by: public-ws-addressing-tests-request@w3.org
02/03/2006 14:50

To
"Arun Gupta" <Arun.Gupta@Sun.COM>, "WS-Addressing Tests" 
<public-ws-addressing-tests@w3.org>
cc

Subject
RE: Mostly red report







My bad, my fix for the "missing message" case caused a side effect.
Checked in a version I'm more confident in.  The next rebuild will tell.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-ws-addressing-tests-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ws-
> addressing-tests-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Arun Gupta
> Sent: Thursday, March 02, 2006 5:51 AM
> To: WS-Addressing Tests
> Subject: Mostly red report
> 
> 
> The report (dated Thu Mar 2 13:08:37 2006 UTC) turned from mostly
green
> to mostly red. It anybody investigating that ?
> 
> -Arun
> --
> got Web Services ?
> Download Java Web Services Developer Pack from
> http://java.sun.com/webservices
Received on Thursday, 2 March 2006 16:28:33 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 19:54:42 UTC