W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-addressing-comments@w3.org > June 2007

RE: Action Property Issue (Web Services Addressing 1.0 - Metadata)

From: Bob Freund <bob@freunds.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 11:24:05 -0400
To: "Cindy McNally" <cindymcnally_6@hotmail.com>, <plh@w3.org>
Cc: <public-ws-addressing-comments@w3.org>
Message-id: <7D5D3FDA429F4D469ADF210408D6245A10F6D9@jeeves.freunds.com>

Cindy,
>From now on, we will be treating this as a formal objection due to the
current phase of this specification.

Would it be possible for you to issue a proposal for your issue today
before the call scheduled for 16:00 Eastern?  
If it would be convenient for you, I would like to invite you to attend
that call so that you may discuss your proposal with the group directly.

We hope to progress the specification by early July, so we hope that
this can be dealt with expeditiously.
I will separately send an email to Mr. Wolff inviting him to today's
call as well.
Thank you
-bob


> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-ws-addressing-comments-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ws-
> addressing-comments-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Cindy McNally
> Sent: Monday, June 18, 2007 4:46 PM
> To: plh@w3.org
> Cc: public-ws-addressing-comments@w3.org
> Subject: RE: Action Property Issue (Web Services Addressing 1.0 -
> Metadata)
> 
> 
> Philippe,
> 
> I believe that this is a substantive issue that should be
reconsidered.
> I
> will post a follow-up citing technical arguments and a proposed
change.
> Please note that two related issues were never formally addressed by
> the
> group:
> 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-
> addressing/2007Jan/0027.html
> 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-
> addressing/2007Mar/0036.html
> 
> Also, from a procedural standpoint, should my follow-up be worded as a
> 'formal objection' or would that occur after reconsideration by the
> workgroup, i.e. assuming the issue is closed again with no action?
> 
> 
> >From: Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>
> >To: cindymcnally_6@hotmail.com
> >CC: public-ws-addressing-comments@w3.org
> >Subject: RE: Action Property Issue (Web Services Addressing 1.0 -
> Metadata)
> >Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2007 15:09:55 +0000
> >
> >Cindy,
> >
> >the Web Services Addressing Working Group would like to move Web
> >Services Addressing 1.0 - Metadata to Candidate Recommendation. Since
> >the Group decided, after due considerations, to close your issue with
> no
> >action [1], we'd like to hear from you and know if you're ok with us
> >moving forward or if you would like the Group to reconsider it. We'd
> >appreciate if you can tell us your position asap. Failing to hear
from
> >you by June 21, we would request the Director to move forward,
> >
> >Thank you,
> >
> >Philippe
> >
> >[1]
> >http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-addressing-
> comments/2007Jun/0000.html
> >
> >
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> Who's that on the Red Carpet? Play & win glamorous prizes.
>
http://club.live.com/red_carpet_reveal.aspx?icid=REDCARPET_hotmailtextl
> ink3
Received on Monday, 18 June 2007 15:24:36 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:19:39 GMT