W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-addressing-comments@w3.org > June 2007

RE: Action Property Issue (Web Services Addressing 1.0 - Metadata)

From: Cindy McNally <cindymcnally_6@hotmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 19:30:43 +0000
Message-ID: <BAY117-F33E07C4C662F48AA144AD1A7130@phx.gbl>
To: bob@freunds.com, plh@w3.org
Cc: public-ws-addressing-comments@w3.org
Hi Bob,

Unfortunately, I cannot attend the call, but hopefully the attached response 
will be sufficient.  Thanks.

>From: "Bob Freund" <bob@freunds.com>
>To: "Cindy McNally" <cindymcnally_6@hotmail.com>,	<plh@w3.org>
>CC: <public-ws-addressing-comments@w3.org>
>Subject: RE: Action Property Issue (Web Services Addressing 1.0 - Metadata)
>Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 11:24:05 -0400
>
>Cindy,
>From now on, we will be treating this as a formal objection due to the
>current phase of this specification.
>
>Would it be possible for you to issue a proposal for your issue today
>before the call scheduled for 16:00 Eastern?
>If it would be convenient for you, I would like to invite you to attend
>that call so that you may discuss your proposal with the group directly.
>
>We hope to progress the specification by early July, so we hope that
>this can be dealt with expeditiously.
>I will separately send an email to Mr. Wolff inviting him to today's
>call as well.
>Thank you
>-bob
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: public-ws-addressing-comments-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ws-
> > addressing-comments-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Cindy McNally
> > Sent: Monday, June 18, 2007 4:46 PM
> > To: plh@w3.org
> > Cc: public-ws-addressing-comments@w3.org
> > Subject: RE: Action Property Issue (Web Services Addressing 1.0 -
> > Metadata)
> >
> >
> > Philippe,
> >
> > I believe that this is a substantive issue that should be
>reconsidered.
> > I
> > will post a follow-up citing technical arguments and a proposed
>change.
> > Please note that two related issues were never formally addressed by
> > the
> > group:
> >
> > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-
> > addressing/2007Jan/0027.html
> >
> > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-
> > addressing/2007Mar/0036.html
> >
> > Also, from a procedural standpoint, should my follow-up be worded as a
> > 'formal objection' or would that occur after reconsideration by the
> > workgroup, i.e. assuming the issue is closed again with no action?
> >
> >
> > >From: Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>
> > >To: cindymcnally_6@hotmail.com
> > >CC: public-ws-addressing-comments@w3.org
> > >Subject: RE: Action Property Issue (Web Services Addressing 1.0 -
> > Metadata)
> > >Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2007 15:09:55 +0000
> > >
> > >Cindy,
> > >
> > >the Web Services Addressing Working Group would like to move Web
> > >Services Addressing 1.0 - Metadata to Candidate Recommendation. Since
> > >the Group decided, after due considerations, to close your issue with
> > no
> > >action [1], we'd like to hear from you and know if you're ok with us
> > >moving forward or if you would like the Group to reconsider it. We'd
> > >appreciate if you can tell us your position asap. Failing to hear
>from
> > >you by June 21, we would request the Director to move forward,
> > >
> > >Thank you,
> > >
> > >Philippe
> > >
> > >[1]
> > >http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-addressing-
> > comments/2007Jun/0000.html
> > >
> > >
> >
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > Who's that on the Red Carpet? Play & win glamorous prizes.
> >
>http://club.live.com/red_carpet_reveal.aspx?icid=REDCARPET_hotmailtextl
> > ink3
>

_________________________________________________________________
Donít miss your chance to WIN $10,000 and other great prizes from Microsoft 
Office Live http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/aub0540003042mrt/direct/01/


Received on Monday, 18 June 2007 19:31:00 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:19:39 GMT