W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-addressing-comments@w3.org > June 2007

[Fwd: Re: Freund 6/4/2007: Editorial Comment on WS-Addr Metadata Section 3.1.1]

From: Monica J. Martin <Monica.Martin@Sun.COM>
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 08:35:29 -0700
To: public-ws-addressing-comments@w3.org
Message-id: <466D6BC1.4050907@sun.com>
Forwarding as requested. Thanks.

attached mail follows:


Monica,
Did you intend to make this comment an issue?
If so, please send it to the public-ws-addressing-comments@w3.org
comments list.
Thanks
-bob

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Monica.Martin@Sun.COM [mailto:Monica.Martin@Sun.COM]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2007 12:32 AM
> To: Bob Freund
> Cc: Fabian Ritzmann; Rama Pulavarthi
> Subject: Freund 6/4/2007: Editorial Comment on WS-Addr Metadata
Section
> 3.1.1
> 
> Section 3.1.1: The current text is somewhat confusing.  Unless
> WS-Addressing seeks to define its own semantics on wsp:Optional, it is
> best to defer to WS-Policy Framework with a reference.
> 
>    Change from:
>        In order to indicate that the subject supports WS-Addressing
but
>        does not require its use, an additional policy alternative
>        should be provided which does not contain this assertion. This
>        may be done in WS-Policy compact form by adding the attribute
>        |wsp:Optional="true"| to the |wsam:Addressing| assertion.
> 
>    Change to:
> 
>        The optional assertion mechanism wsp:Optional, the compact
>        authoring style defined by WS-Policy Framework, is used to
>        specify that the subject supports WS-Addressing but does not
>        require its use for the |wsam:Addressing| assertion (See
>        WS-Policy Framework v1.5 [link]).
Received on Monday, 11 June 2007 15:34:33 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:19:39 GMT