Forwarding as requested. Thanks.
attached mail follows:
Monica, Did you intend to make this comment an issue? If so, please send it to the public-ws-addressing-comments@w3.org comments list. Thanks -bob > -----Original Message----- > From: Monica.Martin@Sun.COM [mailto:Monica.Martin@Sun.COM] > Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2007 12:32 AM > To: Bob Freund > Cc: Fabian Ritzmann; Rama Pulavarthi > Subject: Freund 6/4/2007: Editorial Comment on WS-Addr Metadata Section > 3.1.1 > > Section 3.1.1: The current text is somewhat confusing. Unless > WS-Addressing seeks to define its own semantics on wsp:Optional, it is > best to defer to WS-Policy Framework with a reference. > > Change from: > In order to indicate that the subject supports WS-Addressing but > does not require its use, an additional policy alternative > should be provided which does not contain this assertion. This > may be done in WS-Policy compact form by adding the attribute > |wsp:Optional="true"| to the |wsam:Addressing| assertion. > > Change to: > > The optional assertion mechanism wsp:Optional, the compact > authoring style defined by WS-Policy Framework, is used to > specify that the subject supports WS-Addressing but does not > require its use for the |wsam:Addressing| assertion (See > WS-Policy Framework v1.5 [link]).Received on Monday, 11 June 2007 15:34:33 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:19:39 GMT