W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > May 2012

Re: [whatwg] responsive images

From: Charles Pritchard <chuck@jumis.com>
Date: Tue, 22 May 2012 15:11:23 -0700
Message-ID: <4FBC0F0B.6010708@jumis.com>
To: (wrong string) ¨˝ski <kornel@geekhood.net>
Cc: whatwg@whatwg.org, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
On 5/22/2012 3:08 PM, Kornel Lesi¨˝ski wrote:
> On 22 maj 2012, at 15:57, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 7:26 AM, Kornel Lesi¨˝ski <kornel@geekhood.net> wrote:
>>> I think that 3x device is very very unlikely to ever happen, since 2x screens are may be dense enough to have pixels smaller than human eye can see.
>> Tell that to printers, which can easily hit 400+dpi.  You need more
>> than 2x before you make anti-aliasing fully unnecessary.
> Is making AA unnecessary a goal though?
> It seems to me that antialiasing isn't a complex or computationally expensive problem any more.

3x may happen with browser zoom on desktop and on mobile -- Chrome goes
to 500%.

Received on Tuesday, 22 May 2012 22:12:13 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 13 April 2015 23:09:13 UTC