W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > May 2012

Re: [whatwg] responsive images

From: wrong string <kornel@geekhood.net>
Date: Tue, 22 May 2012 17:08:09 -0500
Message-Id: <5E5BF0DF-6881-4125-9CF9-55506AC754CF@geekhood.net>
To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Cc: whatwg@whatwg.org
On 22 maj 2012, at 15:57, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 7:26 AM, Kornel Lesi¨˝ski <kornel@geekhood.net> wrote:
>> I think that 3x device is very very unlikely to ever happen, since 2x screens are may be dense enough to have pixels smaller than human eye can see.
> 
> Tell that to printers, which can easily hit 400+dpi.  You need more
> than 2x before you make anti-aliasing fully unnecessary.

Is making AA unnecessary a goal though?

It seems to me that antialiasing isn't a complex or computationally expensive problem any more.

-- 
regards, Kornel
Received on Tuesday, 22 May 2012 22:09:12 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 30 January 2013 18:48:08 GMT