W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > February 2007

[whatwg] several messages about HTML5

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 11:44:30 +0100
Message-ID: <op.tn3hgggk64w2qv@id-c0020.orange.nl>
On Wed, 21 Feb 2007 11:33:36 +0100, Gervase Markham <gerv at mozilla.org>  
> I don't see how the analogy holds. Why is using a fairly clean namespace  
> for predefined class names instead of a well-used one the same sort of  
> thing as having HTML parsers stop at the first error?

The analogy I tried to make (apparently it failed) is that design  
decisions for C/C++ are not necessarily good for HTML.

Anne van Kesteren
Received on Wednesday, 21 February 2007 02:44:30 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 13 April 2015 23:08:32 UTC