W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > February 2007

[whatwg] several messages about HTML5

From: Gervase Markham <gerv@mozilla.org>
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 11:01:18 +0000
Message-ID: <45DC267E.6020208@mozilla.org>
Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> The analogy I tried to make (apparently it failed) is that design 
> decisions for C/C++ are not necessarily good for HTML.

Right. But they aren't necessarily bad either. What is wrong with 
picking a clean rather than a dirty namespace for predefined class 
names? Or does "-footer" rather than "footer" offend your sense of 
aesthetics? :-)

Gerv
Received on Wednesday, 21 February 2007 03:01:18 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 13 April 2015 23:08:32 UTC