W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > December 2006

[whatwg] several messages about XML syntax and HTML5

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Tue, 05 Dec 2006 06:57:01 +0100
Message-ID: <45750A2D.7030300@gmx.de>
Ian Hickson schrieb:
> On Mon, 4 Dec 2006, Robert Sayre wrote:
>> On 12/4/06, Ian Hickson <ian at hixie.ch> wrote:
>>> It certainly isn't something that it would make sense to encourage.
>> Is this different than what IE does with <canvas>?
> Yes, because with <canvas> the feature has been carefully designed to have 
> fallback content so that in browsers that don't support <canvas>, you can 
> still see content that represents the same information (assuming authors 
> provide it, of course). There's also an implementation of <canvas> for IE. 
> And, probably most importantly, <canvas> is defined in a specification 
> with exact parsing rules that define how it is to be treated, so if 
> Microsoft decide to implement it, they can do so and ensure 
> interoperability. None of this applies to sending SVG today as text/html.

So which spec is <canvas> defined in (other the one discussed over here, 
which could define SVG-in-HTML as well if the maintainers decided to...)?

Best regards, Julian
Received on Monday, 4 December 2006 21:57:01 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 13 April 2015 23:08:31 UTC