public-webrtc-logs@w3.org from October 2023 by author

Bernard Aboba via GitHub

• Re: [webrtc-extensions] Add RTCIceTransport method to remove candidate pairs (#175) (Thursday, 26 October)
• Closed: [webrtc-extensions] ICE improvements: select a candidate pair (#171) (Thursday, 26 October)
• [webrtc-extensions] new commits pushed by aboba (Thursday, 26 October)
• Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Reflow with tidy (#279) (Thursday, 26 October)
• Closed: [webrtc-svc] Questions on Scalability Mode and Media Capabilities (#95) (Thursday, 19 October)
• Re: [webrtc-svc] Questions on Scalability Mode and Media Capabilities (#95) (Thursday, 19 October)
• Re: [webrtc-encoded-transform] Incompatible SVC metadata (#170) (Thursday, 19 October)
• [webrtc-rtptransport] new commits pushed by aboba (Friday, 13 October)
• [webrtc-rtptransport] new commits pushed by aboba (Friday, 13 October)
• [webrtc-rtptransport] new commits pushed by aboba (Friday, 13 October)
• [webrtc-rtptransport] new commits pushed by aboba (Friday, 6 October)
• [webrtc-rtptransport] Pull Request: Fill in the outline and fix boilerplate (Friday, 6 October)
• [webrtc-rtptransport] new commits pushed by aboba (Wednesday, 4 October)
• [webrtc-rtptransport] new commits pushed by aboba (Wednesday, 4 October)
• [webrtc-rtptransport] new commits pushed by aboba (Wednesday, 4 October)
• [webrtc-rtptransport] new commits pushed by aboba (Wednesday, 4 October)
• [webrtc-rtptransport] new commits pushed by aboba (Wednesday, 4 October)
• [webrtc-rtptransport] Pull Request: Add fill out README file and add explainer (Wednesday, 4 October)

Byoungchan Lee via GitHub

• [webrtc-svc] Questions on Scalability Mode and Media Capabilities (#95) (Thursday, 19 October)

Christoph Guttandin via GitHub

• Re: [mediacapture-main] Racy devicechange event design has poor interoperability (#972) (Thursday, 12 October)

Dominique Hazael-Massieux via GitHub

• [mediacapture-screen-share] new commits pushed by dontcallmedom (Thursday, 26 October)
• [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Update to ReSpec version 34.2.0 (Monday, 23 October)
• [mediacapture-main] Pull Request: Update to latest ReSpec version 34.2.0 (Monday, 23 October)
• Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Reflow with tidy (#279) (Thursday, 19 October)
• Re: [webrtc-encoded-transform] IDL changes for setMetadata for 3.2.2 webrtc nv use case (#202) (Wednesday, 11 October)
• Re: [webrtc-encoded-transform] IDL changes for setMetadata for 3.2.2 webrtc nv use case (#202) (Wednesday, 11 October)
• [webrtc-rtptransport] Pull Request: Set up for automatic bikeshed generation and PR preview (Tuesday, 10 October)
• Re: [webrtc-encoded-transform] add mimeType to metadata (#140) (Tuesday, 10 October)
• Re: [webrtc-encoded-transform] Add description of an API for controlling SDP codec negotiation (#186) (Monday, 9 October)
• Re: [webrtc-encoded-transform] add mimeType to metadata (#140) (Friday, 6 October)
• [webrtc-encoded-transform] Pull Request: Remove (de)serialization of no longer existent RTCEncodedVideoFrame.timestamp (Friday, 6 October)

Elad Alon via GitHub

• [mediacapture-handle] new commits pushed by eladalon1983 (Friday, 6 October)
• Re: [mediacapture-handle] Use selfBrowserSurface in demo (#72) (Friday, 6 October)
• [mediacapture-handle] Pull Request: Use selfBrowserSurface in demo (Friday, 6 October)

guidou via GitHub

• Re: [webrtc-encoded-transform] Is frame-level fanout in scope of WebRTC encoded transform? (#211) (Monday, 30 October)
• Re: [webrtc-encoded-transform] Remove restriction on streams being limited to only one PC (#201) (Monday, 23 October)
• Re: [mediacapture-main] Racy devicechange event design has poor interoperability (#972) (Thursday, 12 October)
• Re: [mediacapture-image] Why is https://www.w3.org/TR/image-capture/#dom-mediatrackcapabilities-torch a boolean (#304) (Tuesday, 10 October)

Harald Alvestrand via GitHub

• Re: [webrtc-encoded-transform] Add description of an API for controlling SDP codec negotiation (#186) (Tuesday, 31 October)
• Re: [webrtc-encoded-transform] Is frame-level fanout in scope of WebRTC encoded transform? (#211) (Monday, 30 October)
• Re: [webrtc-encoded-transform] Is frame-level fanout in scope of WebRTC encoded transform? (#211) (Monday, 30 October)
• Re: [webrtc-encoded-transform] Is frame-level fanout in scope of WebRTC encoded transform? (#211) (Tuesday, 24 October)
• Re: [webrtc-encoded-transform] Incompatible SVC metadata (#170) (Thursday, 19 October)
• Re: [webrtc-encoded-transform] Congestion control API proposal (#207) (Wednesday, 18 October)
• Re: [webrtc-encoded-transform] Congestion control API proposal (#207) (Wednesday, 18 October)
• [webrtc-encoded-transform] API for processing keyframe requests in JS (#210) (Wednesday, 18 October)
• Re: [webrtc-encoded-transform] Add description of an API for controlling SDP codec negotiation (#186) (Tuesday, 17 October)
• Re: [webrtc-encoded-transform] Add description of an API for controlling SDP codec negotiation (#186) (Monday, 16 October)
• Re: [webrtc-encoded-transform] Add description of an API for controlling SDP codec negotiation (#186) (Monday, 16 October)
• Re: [webrtc-encoded-transform] Add description of an API for controlling SDP codec negotiation (#186) (Sunday, 15 October)
• Re: [webrtc-encoded-transform] Add description of an API for controlling SDP codec negotiation (#186) (Friday, 13 October)
• [webrtc-encoded-transform] new commits pushed by alvestrand (Thursday, 12 October)
• Closed: [webrtc-encoded-transform] Expose MIME type as frame metadata (#158) (Thursday, 12 October)
• Re: [webrtc-encoded-transform] Add description of an API for controlling SDP codec negotiation (#186) (Wednesday, 11 October)
• Re: [webrtc-encoded-transform] Add description of an API for controlling SDP codec negotiation (#186) (Wednesday, 11 October)
• Re: [webrtc-encoded-transform] Add description of an API for controlling SDP codec negotiation (#186) (Tuesday, 10 October)
• Re: [webrtc-encoded-transform] Add description of an API for controlling SDP codec negotiation (#186) (Tuesday, 10 October)
• Re: [webrtc-encoded-transform] Congestion control API proposal (#207) (Tuesday, 10 October)
• Re: [webrtc-encoded-transform] add mimeType to metadata (#140) (Tuesday, 10 October)
• Re: [webrtc-encoded-transform] Remove (de)serialization of no longer existent RTCEncodedVideoFrame.timestamp (#208) (Monday, 9 October)
• [webrtc-encoded-transform] new commits pushed by alvestrand (Monday, 9 October)
• Closed: [webrtc-encoded-transform] SDP mangling: control encoding or control packetization? (#199) (Friday, 6 October)
• Re: [webrtc-encoded-transform] SDP mangling: control encoding or control packetization? (#199) (Friday, 6 October)
• Re: [webrtc-encoded-transform] Add description of an API for controlling SDP codec negotiation (#186) (Friday, 6 October)
• Re: [webrtc-encoded-transform] Need APIs for using WebCodec with PeerConnection (#121) (Friday, 6 October)
• Re: [webrtc-encoded-transform] Encoded frame IDLs share definitions with WebCodecs (#99) (Thursday, 5 October)
• Re: [webrtc-encoded-transform] What does sender.generateKeyFrame() do when sender.track is null, ended or disabled? (#185) (Thursday, 5 October)
• Re: [webrtc-encoded-transform] Timing Metadata (#167) (Thursday, 5 October)
• Re: [webrtc-encoded-transform] Define needed data to pass between depacketizer and decoder (#174) (Thursday, 5 October)
• Re: [webrtc-encoded-transform] add mimeType to metadata (#140) (Thursday, 5 October)
• Re: [webrtc-encoded-transform] Congestion control API proposal (#207) (Thursday, 5 October)
• [webrtc-encoded-transform] Pull Request: Congestion control API proposal (Wednesday, 4 October)
• [webrtc-encoded-transform] new commits pushed by alvestrand (Wednesday, 4 October)
• Closed: [webrtc-encoded-transform] Move RTP Timestamp to Metadata and rename (#203) (Wednesday, 4 October)
• Re: [webrtc-encoded-transform] Expose flow control information to transform (#206) (Monday, 2 October)

henbos via GitHub

• Re: [webrtc-extensions] What happens if setSelectedCandidatePair() is called early? (#180) (Tuesday, 31 October)
• Re: [webrtc-extensions] Can we rename setSelectedCandidatePair to selectCandidatePair ? (#178) (Tuesday, 31 October)
• Re: [webrtc-extensions] Add RTCIceTransport method to remove candidate pairs (#175) (Friday, 27 October)
• Re: [webrtc-stats] Clarify media-source frame rates (frames and framesPerSecond) (#708) (Monday, 23 October)
• Re: [webrtc-stats] Clarify media-source frame rates (frames and framesPerSecond) (#708) (Monday, 23 October)
• Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Reflow with tidy (#279) (Thursday, 19 October)
• Re: [webrtc-provisional-stats] Identify the state of provisional stats (#43) (Wednesday, 11 October)
• Re: [webrtc-provisional-stats] Identify the state of provisional stats (#43) (Wednesday, 11 October)
• Re: [webrtc-provisional-stats] Identify the state of provisional stats (#43) (Wednesday, 11 October)
• Re: [webrtc-provisional-stats] Identify the state of provisional stats (#43) (Wednesday, 11 October)
• Re: [webrtc-provisional-stats] Identify the state of provisional stats (#43) (Wednesday, 11 October)
• Re: [webrtc-provisional-stats] Identify the state of provisional stats (#43) (Wednesday, 11 October)
• Re: [webrtc-provisional-stats] Identify the state of provisional stats (#43) (Tuesday, 10 October)

Jan-Ivar Bruaroey via GitHub

• [webrtc-extensions] Clarify how icecandidatepairnominate and selectCandidatePair are to be used (#184) (Tuesday, 31 October)
• Re: [webrtc-extensions] Unclear when all side-effects of setSelectedCandidatePair have taken effect (#182) (Tuesday, 31 October)
• Re: [webrtc-extensions] What does it mean to NOT nominate candidatePair? (#179) (Tuesday, 31 October)
• [webrtc-extensions] Pull Request: Move algorithm to setSelectedCandidatePair method, and use [=this=]. (Monday, 30 October)
• [webrtc-extensions] What happens if setSelectedCandidatePair() is called early? (#180) (Monday, 30 October)
• Re: [webrtc-extensions] What does it mean to NOT nominate candidatePair? (#179) (Monday, 30 October)
• Re: [webrtc-extensions] What does it mean to NOT nominate candidatePair? (#179) (Monday, 30 October)
• [webrtc-extensions] What does it mean to NOT nominate candidatePair? (#179) (Monday, 30 October)
• Re: [webrtc-extensions] Can we rename setSelectedCandidatePair to selectCandidatePair ? (#178) (Monday, 30 October)
• Re: [webrtc-extensions] Can we rename setSelectedCandidatePair to selectCandidatePair ? (#178) (Monday, 30 October)
• [webrtc-extensions] Can we rename setSelectedCandidatePair to selectCandidatePair ? (#178) (Friday, 27 October)
• [webrtc-extensions] Pull Request: Don't fire icecandidatepairadd if closed + avoid competing normative prose (Friday, 27 October)
• [webrtc-extensions] icecandidatepairadd is fired on closed pc (#176) (Friday, 27 October)
• Closed: [mediacapture-image] Broken references in MediaStream Image Capture (#302) (Thursday, 26 October)
• [mediacapture-image] new commits pushed by jan-ivar (Thursday, 26 October)
• Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Reflow with tidy (#279) (Thursday, 26 October)
• Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Reflow with tidy (#279) (Thursday, 19 October)
• Re: [webrtc-encoded-transform] Add description of an API for controlling SDP codec negotiation (#186) (Wednesday, 18 October)
• Re: [webrtc-encoded-transform] Add description of an API for controlling SDP codec negotiation (#186) (Tuesday, 17 October)
• [webrtc-encoded-transform] Spec doesn’t say what happens on reuse (#209) (Monday, 16 October)
• Re: [webrtc-encoded-transform] Add description of an API for controlling SDP codec negotiation (#186) (Monday, 16 October)
• Re: [webrtc-encoded-transform] Add description of an API for controlling SDP codec negotiation (#186) (Friday, 13 October)
• Re: [mediacapture-main] Racy devicechange event design has poor interoperability (#972) (Thursday, 12 October)
• Re: [mediacapture-main] Racy devicechange event design has poor interoperability (#972) (Thursday, 12 October)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] Prevent GC of non-closed RTCDataChannels (#2902) (Thursday, 12 October)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] Should garbage collecting RTCDataChannels be observable? (#2624) (Friday, 6 October)
• [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Prevent GC of non-closed RTCDataChannels (Friday, 6 October)
• Re: [webrtc-encoded-transform] What does sender.generateKeyFrame() do when sender.track is null, ended or disabled? (#185) (Thursday, 5 October)
• Closed: [webrtc-encoded-transform] What does sender.generateKeyFrame() do when sender.track is null, ended or disabled? (#185) (Thursday, 5 October)

Kagami Sascha Rosylight via GitHub

• Re: [webrtc-encoded-transform] Move RTP timestamp members to Metadata objects (#204) (Sunday, 8 October)

Karl Tomlinson via GitHub

• Re: [mediacapture-main] Racy devicechange event design has poor interoperability (#972) (Thursday, 5 October)

Palak Agarwal via GitHub

• Re: [webrtc-encoded-transform] IDL changes for setMetadata for 3.2.2 webrtc nv use case (#202) (Wednesday, 11 October)
• Re: [webrtc-encoded-transform] IDL changes for setMetadata for 3.2.2 webrtc nv use case (#202) (Friday, 6 October)

Peter Thatcher via GitHub

• Re: [webrtc-extensions] What does it mean to NOT nominate candidatePair? (#179) (Tuesday, 31 October)
• Re: [webrtc-extensions] Move algorithm to setSelectedCandidatePair method, and use [=this=]. (#181) (Tuesday, 31 October)
• Re: [webrtc-extensions] Rename setSelectedCandidatePair and return a promise (#183) (Tuesday, 31 October)
• Re: [webrtc-extensions] Add RTCIceTransport method to remove candidate pairs (#175) (Tuesday, 31 October)
• [webrtc-rtptransport] new commits pushed by pthatcher (Friday, 13 October)
• [webrtc-rtptransport] new commits pushed by pthatcher (Friday, 13 October)

Philipel-WebRTC via GitHub

• Re: [webrtc-encoded-transform] Add description of an API for controlling SDP codec negotiation (#186) (Tuesday, 10 October)
• Re: [webrtc-encoded-transform] Add description of an API for controlling SDP codec negotiation (#186) (Monday, 9 October)

Philipp Hancke via GitHub

• Re: [webrtc-pc] Clarification around msid generation (#2782) (Wednesday, 25 October)
• Re: [webrtc-encoded-transform] add mimeType to metadata (#140) (Tuesday, 10 October)
• Re: [webrtc-encoded-transform] add mimeType to metadata (#140) (Thursday, 5 October)
• Re: [webrtc-encoded-transform] Move RTP timestamp members to Metadata objects (#204) (Thursday, 5 October)

Rijubrata Bhaumik via GitHub

• [mediacapture-image] new commits pushed by riju (Tuesday, 10 October)
• Closed: [mediacapture-image] Why is https://www.w3.org/TR/image-capture/#dom-mediatrackcapabilities-torch a boolean (#304) (Tuesday, 10 October)

Sameer via GitHub

• Re: [webrtc-extensions] What does it mean to NOT nominate candidatePair? (#179) (Tuesday, 31 October)
• Re: [webrtc-extensions] Rename setSelectedCandidatePair and return a promise (#183) (Tuesday, 31 October)
• [webrtc-extensions] Pull Request: Rename setSelectedCandidatePair and return a promise (Tuesday, 31 October)
• [webrtc-extensions] Unclear when all side-effects of setSelectedCandidatePair have taken effect (#182) (Tuesday, 31 October)
• Re: [webrtc-extensions] Don't fire icecandidatepairadd if closed + avoid competing normative prose (#177) (Tuesday, 31 October)
• Re: [webrtc-extensions] Move algorithm to setSelectedCandidatePair method, and use [=this=]. (#181) (Tuesday, 31 October)
• Re: [webrtc-extensions] Can we rename setSelectedCandidatePair to selectCandidatePair ? (#178) (Monday, 30 October)

Varun Singh via GitHub

• Re: [webrtc-provisional-stats] Identify the state of provisional stats (#43) (Tuesday, 10 October)
• Re: [webrtc-provisional-stats] Identify the state of provisional stats (#43) (Tuesday, 10 October)

youennf via GitHub

• Re: [webrtc-encoded-transform] Is frame-level fanout in scope of WebRTC encoded transform? (#211) (Wednesday, 25 October)
• Re: [webrtc-encoded-transform] Is frame-level fanout in scope of WebRTC encoded transform? (#211) (Tuesday, 24 October)
• [webrtc-encoded-transform] Is frame-level fanout in scope of WebRTC encoded transform? (#211) (Tuesday, 24 October)
• Re: [webrtc-encoded-transform] Add description of an API for controlling SDP codec negotiation (#186) (Tuesday, 17 October)
• Re: [webrtc-encoded-transform] Add description of an API for controlling SDP codec negotiation (#186) (Monday, 16 October)
• Re: [webrtc-encoded-transform] Add description of an API for controlling SDP codec negotiation (#186) (Friday, 13 October)
• Re: [webrtc-provisional-stats] Identify the state of provisional stats (#43) (Wednesday, 11 October)
• Re: [webrtc-provisional-stats] Identify the state of provisional stats (#43) (Tuesday, 10 October)
• Re: [webrtc-encoded-transform] Congestion control API proposal (#207) (Tuesday, 10 October)
• Re: [mediacapture-image] Make torch capability a sequence<boolean> like other similar capabilities like echoCancellation (#305) (Tuesday, 10 October)
• [mediacapture-image] Pull Request: Make torch capability a sequence<boolean> like other similar capabilities like echoCancellation (Tuesday, 10 October)
• Re: [webrtc-provisional-stats] Identify the state of provisional stats (#43) (Monday, 9 October)
• [webrtc-provisional-stats] Identify the state of provisional stats (#43) (Monday, 9 October)
• Closed: [webrtc-encoded-transform] Should we rename SFrameTransform and RTCRtpScriptTransform (#65) (Thursday, 5 October)
• Re: [webrtc-encoded-transform] Should we rename SFrameTransform and RTCRtpScriptTransform (#65) (Thursday, 5 October)
• Closed: [webrtc-encoded-transform] Optimizing encoded frame buffer allocation and memory copies (#49) (Thursday, 5 October)
• Re: [webrtc-encoded-transform] Optimizing encoded frame buffer allocation and memory copies (#49) (Thursday, 5 October)
• Closed: [webrtc-encoded-transform] Should there be a RTCConfiguration boolean to prevent data to be sent without being transformed (#104) (Thursday, 5 October)
• Re: [webrtc-encoded-transform] Should there be a RTCConfiguration boolean to prevent data to be sent without being transformed (#104) (Thursday, 5 October)
• Re: [webrtc-encoded-transform] What does sender.generateKeyFrame() do when sender.track is null, ended or disabled? (#185) (Thursday, 5 October)
• Re: [webrtc-encoded-transform] What does sender.generateKeyFrame() do when sender.track is null, ended or disabled? (#185) (Thursday, 5 October)
• Re: [webrtc-encoded-transform] Is "empty" value of RTCEncodedVideoFrameType useful? (#156) (Thursday, 5 October)
• Re: [webrtc-encoded-transform] Congestion control API proposal (#207) (Thursday, 5 October)
• [mediacapture-image] Why is https://www.w3.org/TR/image-capture/#dom-mediatrackcapabilities-torch a boolean (#304) (Wednesday, 4 October)

石头 via GitHub

• [webrtc-stats] define an mechanism for setting the trigger duration for a video freeze (#771) (Monday, 9 October)
• [webrtc-stats] Exposing audio interruption metrics to JavaScript (#770) (Monday, 9 October)

Last message date: Tuesday, 31 October 2023 18:50:20 UTC