W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webplatform@w3.org > January 2013

Re: Responsive concept page on WPD

From: Sam Dutton <dutton@google.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 10:44:31 +0000
Message-ID: <CAACxJ5o-nA7eGO=MyHU9YEcKirkBUR2NiCEYjcVT5=WL0jjzoQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mike Sierra <letmespellitoutforyou@gmail.com>
Cc: Scott Rowe <scottrowe@google.com>, "public-webplatform@w3.org" <public-webplatform@w3.org>, Paul Irish <paulirish@google.com>, Pete LePage <petele@google.com>
I've filed a bug <https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=20802> for
thumb images.

Sam

On 28 January 2013 22:37, Mike Sierra <letmespellitoutforyou@gmail.com>wrote:

> Looks like the problem is the element within the one you modified is
> floating within it, causing it to collapse down.  Looks like the
> formatting belongs on the one classed "tleft".
>
> And I'd float:right all of them to keep readers from getting
> disoriented by the indentation.
>
> --Mike S
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 5:18 PM, Scott Rowe <scottrowe@google.com> wrote:
> > I tried an in-line style, <div style='padding:10px 100px 10px 0px;
> > margin:10px 100px 10px 0px'>, but couldn't get that right margin to
> budge.
> > What's really weird is how the bullets bleed through the image.
> >
> > Yes, please do file some bugs here Sam.
> >
> > I'm hoping that someone on the list can provide a solution until we have
> > bugs/fixes.
> >
> > +Scott
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 1:58 AM, Sam Dutton <dutton@google.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Aw boy.. Visually this page is awkward
> >>
> >>
> >> Yep -- it's a bit grim.
> >>
> >> The main problems are:
> >> - lack of frame around thumbnail image
> >> - lack of margins
> >> - poor vertical alignment: the top of an image doesn't align with the
> top
> >> of the text next to it
> >>
> >> The standard MediaWiki thumb image CSS would fix a lot of these
> problems.
> >>
> >> Scott -- I'm happy to raise bugs for these if you like, or get on the
> >> mailing list and suggest a CSS solution. Not sure why the CSS is
> different
> >> from the standard MediaWiki installation.
> >>
> >> It might also be handy to build some templates for images and other
> media.
> >>
> >> Sam
> >>
> >>
> >> On 26 January 2013 00:03, Paul Irish <paulirish@google.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Aw boy.. Visually this page is awkward and its not any fault of yours,
> >>> really. :/
> >>>
> >>> It works pretty well for me as far as image placement, but the article
> >>> CSS could use some help. Scott can you bring this up on the mailing
> list or
> >>> telecon? Basically I'd like more articles in the future to have a rich
> >>> layout that supports something like what Sam is trying to do and it's
> going
> >>> take some massaging for a generic solution.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 5:27 AM, Sam Dutton <dutton@google.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Hi Scott/Pete/Paul
> >>>>
> >>>> At Paul's excellent suggestion, I've added some images to the RWD
> >>>> concept page on WPD.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> docs.webplatform.org/w/index.php?title=concepts/mobile_web/responsive_design
> >>>>
> >>>> Please could you sanity check this?
> >>>>
> >>>> Once we're happy with it, I'll ask external devs to take a a look.
> >>>>
> >>>> Caveat: adding images to WPD articles is slow and painful, and some of
> >>>> the normal MediaWiki formatting (e.g. frames on thumbnails) doesn't
> work.
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks!
> >>>>
> >>>> Sam
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
>
Received on Wednesday, 30 January 2013 10:51:30 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 8 May 2013 19:57:38 UTC