W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webplatform@w3.org > January 2013

Re: Priority list for WPD work going forward

From: Julee Burdekin <jburdeki@adobe.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2013 13:21:11 -0800
To: Scott Rowe <scottrowe@google.com>, Chris Mills <cmills@opera.com>
CC: "public-webplatform@w3.org" <public-webplatform@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CD15C142.4E858%jburdeki@adobe.com>
Yes, thanks Chris! Yes, API will take more than a month. I'm wondering if we couldn't creating a little scrum process for content to identify what's priority, get it done & reviewed, and "release" it via social media channels. That way, whenever the site is functionally at beta, we could go out with whatever content is there and highlight the great stuff.

What do you think?

J
----------------------------
julee@adobe.com
@adobejulee

From: Scott Rowe <scottrowe@google.com<mailto:scottrowe@google.com>>
Date: Friday, January 11, 2013 1:09 PM
To: Chris Mills <cmills@opera.com<mailto:cmills@opera.com>>
Cc: "public-webplatform@w3.org<mailto:public-webplatform@w3.org>" <public-webplatform@w3.org<mailto:public-webplatform@w3.org>>
Subject: Re: Priority list for WPD work going forward
Resent-From: <public-webplatform@w3.org<mailto:public-webplatform@w3.org>>
Resent-Date: Friday, January 11, 2013 1:10 PM

Wow, Chris! Thanks for this exhaustive (and exhausting) list.

One thing, the API Docs project is definitely going to take longer than a month. With the Resources arm of the rubber triangle not known, it is difficult to gage how long, but Dave and I are in the midst of scoping the work and planning for recruitment (yes, posters, too).

We'll want to marshall forces for the CSS Properties project first, however. A lot of work could get done during the doc sprint.

+Scott



On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 10:02 AM, Chris Mills <cmills@opera.com<mailto:cmills@opera.com>> wrote:
As actioned in Monday's meeting, I have started to draw up a list of different tasks that we want to do to sort content out going forward, arranged in a priority list. I haven't finished it yet; I wanted to get some feedback from everyone before going any further

http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/WPD:Beta_Requirements

Is this a useful way to represent the data? When TBG is set up, we can probably move it there, which will allow a much more intelligent structuring of the work.

Best,

Chris Mills
Opera Software, dev.opera.com<http://dev.opera.com>
W3C Fellow, web education and webplatform.org<http://webplatform.org>
Author of "Practical CSS3: Develop and Design" (http://goo.gl/AKf9M)
Received on Friday, 11 January 2013 21:21:52 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 8 May 2013 19:57:37 UTC