W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webplatform@w3.org > October 2012

Re: Subpages overwhelms the content

From: Peter Lubbers <peterlubbers@google.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2012 02:51:29 +0900
Message-ID: <CACCmPHyHh3yteqzygqJ4cvV=FC-pBvUHOAe5JQpDG+qptqOZ4Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Jonathan Garbee <jonathan@garbee.me>
Cc: public-webplatform@w3.org
Hi Garbee,
That definitely sounds like a good task for Saturday's doc sprint.
Please add it to the Most Wanted section.
--Peter

On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 2:29 AM, Jonathan Garbee <jonathan@garbee.me> wrote:

>  Example:  Turns out my original example was me not understanding the
> form setup correctly.  But, I also noticed when going to check that the
> /html/elements [1] form structure seems odd.  Is the entire table and list
> displayed on that table compiled using the "Print all subpages rooted here"
> check under the Basic Listing Configuration?  Also there is a See Also
> section but nothing is in that section of the form.  Is that due to it
> using a Topic Cluster?  If so then we should find a way to improve the
> usability of these forms and let people know how they work better.  It
> seems to be a pretty intricate system.
>
> As far as touching goes since we can't do a DB query, if we do just touch
> things should we summarize with simply "touch"?  I could work on this here
> and there and make a bug report for it that people could hopefully work on
> during a Doc Sprint and add to the Most Wanted Tasks list as something
> people can just do to help out.  I understand wanting them to be
> organically edited to be brought into the new system, but if this is all it
> takes I think it is worth doing to try and get things sorted ASAP.
>
> -Garbee
>
>
> On 10/31/2012 1:18 PM, Alex Komoroske wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 1:55 AM, Jonathan Garbee <jonathan@garbee.me>wrote:
>
>>  You have made perfect sense to me.  I also found this [1] bug report
>> which is also about the subject as well.
>>
>> Something I have noticed though is some of these pages when you go to
>> edit them the content is not shown,
>>
>
>  Do you have an example of this? I'd like to debug.
>
>
>>  you must go to edit source.  If we just open then save would the
>> content be brought over?
>>
>
>  Generally semantic forms is *pretty *good about maintaining the bits
> that don't fit into structured form fields between an open and a save. But
> I'd like to test that to verify. :-)
>
>>
>> If it is really just doing that is there no way to do a DB query of some
>> kind to just set everything the way it needs to be for all articles?
>>
>
>  Unfortunately, it's a bit harder than that, apparently.  The magic part
> of the "touch" process is when semantic forms looks at what templates are
> *supposed *to be on the page and then puts them there if they aren't yet.
> Semantic forms, in my limited understanding, is layered pretty much just on
> top of MediaWiki, which of course is layered on top of the database part.
> So you'd need to do something far more intricate than just working directly
> with the database. What exactly that would entail, I don't know.
>
>>
>> -Garbee
>>
>> [1] https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=19348
>>
>>
>
>
Received on Wednesday, 31 October 2012 17:52:19 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 8 May 2013 19:57:34 UTC