On Aug 6, 2014 3:57 PM, "Jeff Jaffe" <jeff@w3.org> wrote: > > > On 8/6/2014 2:43 PM, Brian Kardell wrote: >> >> >> On Aug 6, 2014 1:54 PM, "Jeff Jaffe" <jeff@w3.org> wrote: >> > >> > >> > So I can't tell. Did my proposal accomplish this or fall short of this? >> > >> >> Close I think. I didn't see the presentation, > > > I wasn't talking about my June presentation (which was essentially the previous wiki), I was referring to the way I was trying to find a middle ground earlier in this thread. > > Ah, sorry, I misunderstood. So the proposal is like my own, but the charter review feedback isn't formally counter, but at the discretion of the director? What about votes? Honestly I'm a little dismayed by what appear to be efforts to prevent folks who might be paying members from being anything but. In fact, even in current proposals this is asking individuals to have way more "skin in the game" than 99% of current members (because members are individuals and it costs them nothing, their member -org- pays the bill and at that level, for many of them the price point is often negligible). The incentives and disincentives toward "common good" seem very at odds with what you'd think. Maybe it's hard for me to understand their position, I welcome any discussion here or off list (and off the record) from any AC who feels they can articulate this better. It would probably be efficient than a telephone game anyway.
Received on Wednesday, 6 August 2014 20:27:15 UTC