Re: Webizen progress and next meeting

On 8/6/2014 2:43 PM, Brian Kardell wrote:
>
>
> On Aug 6, 2014 1:54 PM, "Jeff Jaffe" <jeff@w3.org 
> <mailto:jeff@w3.org>> wrote:
> >
> >
> > So I can't tell.  Did my proposal accomplish this or fall short of this?
> >
>
> Close I think.  I didn't see the presentation,
>

I wasn't talking about my June presentation (which was essentially the 
previous wiki), I was referring to the way I was trying to find a middle 
ground earlier in this thread.

> so I'm not quite sure how it was perceived, but it felt a little wishy 
> washy on goals and how.  What I articulate above very nearly fits in 
> w3c existing tech and structure and is relatively simple and pointed, 
> call it a RG (representation group) rather than a CG, instead of 5 
> backers to be viable it takes N (or a total pledge amount), and it 
> simply acts as an org affiliation - chairs are ACs and they are just 
> orgs like any other. Its entire purpose is simply to allow developer 
> collective participation without the lopsided burden (requiring them 
> to form a legal entity is kind of like a poll tax).
>