- From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
- Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2013 06:30:12 -0400
- To: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>, Rick Byers <rbyers@chromium.org>, Sangwhan Moon <me@sangwhan.com>, Matt Brubeck <mbrubeck@mozilla.com>
- CC: "public-webevents@w3.org" <public-webevents@w3.org>, Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>
On 10/2/13 2:26 AM, ext Doug Schepers wrote: > Hi, folks– > > TimBL (the Director), while generally supportive of moving the Web > Events spec forward and resolving the WebIDL dependency expeditiously, > wasn't satisfied with the wording we proposed around conforming only > to the WebIDL syntax; he wanted for us to make as strong a claim as > possible, while not exaggerating the conformance we anticipate. > > So, PLH and I asked Cameron McCormack, the editor of WebIDL, how he > thinks we could most accurately and precisely characterized the Touch > Events spec's conformance criterion for WebIDL, and he suggested some > text which I've included in the Editor's Draft of the spec [1]. TimBL > accepted this text. > > We believe that this is both accurate and informative, and neither > overstates nor understates the requirements for an implementation > conforming to WebIDL in the context of Touch Events. > > Assuming this WG is happy with this text, and if we have no objections > from the WebApps WG (ArtB, can you handle that?), the next step would > be to move the Web Events spec to Recommendation (possibly as soon as > next week). > > Is this text acceptable to everyone? The proposed text is OK with me. If anyone objects to this change, please reply to this e-mail with your concerns by by October 6 at the latest. Silence will be considered as agreement with this change. -ArtB > > [1] > https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/webevents/raw-file/v1/touchevents.html#webidl-conform > > Regards- > -Doug
Received on Wednesday, 2 October 2013 10:41:29 UTC