- From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
- Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2013 14:36:25 -0400
- To: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>, Rick Byers <rbyers@chromium.org>, Sangwhan Moon <me@sangwhan.com>, Matt Brubeck <mbrubeck@mozilla.com>
- CC: "public-webevents@w3.org" <public-webevents@w3.org>, Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>
On 10/2/13 6:30 AM, Arthur Barstow wrote: > On 10/2/13 2:26 AM, ext Doug Schepers wrote: >> Hi, folks– >> >> TimBL (the Director), while generally supportive of moving the Web >> Events spec forward and resolving the WebIDL dependency >> expeditiously, wasn't satisfied with the wording we proposed around >> conforming only to the WebIDL syntax; he wanted for us to make as >> strong a claim as possible, while not exaggerating the conformance we >> anticipate. >> >> So, PLH and I asked Cameron McCormack, the editor of WebIDL, how he >> thinks we could most accurately and precisely characterized the Touch >> Events spec's conformance criterion for WebIDL, and he suggested some >> text which I've included in the Editor's Draft of the spec [1]. TimBL >> accepted this text. >> >> We believe that this is both accurate and informative, and neither >> overstates nor understates the requirements for an implementation >> conforming to WebIDL in the context of Touch Events. >> >> Assuming this WG is happy with this text, and if we have no >> objections from the WebApps WG (ArtB, can you handle that?), the next >> step would be to move the Web Events spec to Recommendation (possibly >> as soon as next week). >> >> Is this text acceptable to everyone? > > The proposed text is OK with me. Doug, All, I meant to voice support for this change as an Editor of Touch Events and as a Chair of WebAppsWG (the group responsible for Web IDL). -Thanks, ArtB > > If anyone objects to this change, please reply to this e-mail with > your concerns by by October 6 at the latest. > > Silence will be considered as agreement with this change. > > -ArtB > > >> >> [1] >> https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/webevents/raw-file/v1/touchevents.html#webidl-conform >> >> Regards- >> -Doug >
Received on Wednesday, 2 October 2013 18:54:30 UTC