Re: Is the "Key" interface name too generic? from Richard Barnes on 2014-05-06 (public-webcrypto@w3.org from May 2014)

From: Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx>
Date: Tue, 6 May 2014 09:37:44 -0700
To: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>
Cc: Ryan Sleevi <sleevi@google.com>, "public-webcrypto@w3.org" <public-webcrypto@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CAL02cgSvXx1DyFn5PnA9yaHRX-2k5x6u-Jf5VyjRv6_qkreEKA@mail.gmail.com>

+1


On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 8:48 AM, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu> wrote:

> On 5/6/14, 11:37 AM, Ryan Sleevi wrote:
>
>> Absent that, CryptoKey seems to be popular internally here. Preferences
>> from you?
>>
>
> Given that I suggested CryptoKey in my original mail.... worksforme.  ;)
>
> -Boris
>
>
>

Received on Tuesday, 6 May 2014 16:38:12 UTC