public-webcrypto@w3.org from May 2014 by author

Boris Zbarsky

• Re: Is the "Key" interface name too generic? (Tuesday, 6 May)
• Re: Is the "Key" interface name too generic? (Tuesday, 6 May)
• Re: Is the "Key" interface name too generic? (Tuesday, 6 May)

bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

• [Bug 25912] DOMException.prototype.message is up to implementations (Thursday, 29 May)
• [Bug 25912] DOMException.prototype.message is up to implementations (Thursday, 29 May)
• [Bug 25912] New: DOMException.prototype.message is up to implementations (Thursday, 29 May)
• [Bug 25839] Curve25519 Named Curve (Monday, 26 May)
• [Bug 25839] Curve25519 Named Curve (Saturday, 24 May)
• [Bug 25839] Curve25519 Named Curve (Saturday, 24 May)
• [Bug 25839] Curve25519 Named Curve (Saturday, 24 May)
• [Bug 25839] Curve25519 Named Curve (Saturday, 24 May)
• [Bug 25839] Curve25519 Named Curve (Saturday, 24 May)
• [Bug 25839] Curve25519 Named Curve (Saturday, 24 May)
• [Bug 25839] Curve25519 Named Curve (Saturday, 24 May)
• [Bug 25839] Curve25519 Named Curve (Saturday, 24 May)
• [Bug 25839] Curve25519 Named Curve (Wednesday, 21 May)
• [Bug 25857] New: Extractability is not always specified when importing keys (in particular public keys) (Wednesday, 21 May)
• [Bug 25839] Curve25519 Named Curve (Wednesday, 21 May)
• [Bug 25839] Curve25519 Named Curve (Wednesday, 21 May)
• [Bug 25839] Curve25519 Named Curve (Wednesday, 21 May)
• [Bug 25842] Web developers given enough crypto rope to shoot selves in foot (Wednesday, 21 May)
• [Bug 25721] extractable keys should be disabled by default (Wednesday, 21 May)
• [Bug 25842] New: Web developers given enough crypto rope to shoot selves in foot (Tuesday, 20 May)
• [Bug 25839] Curve25519 Named Curve (Tuesday, 20 May)
• [Bug 25839] Curve25519 Named Curve (Tuesday, 20 May)
• [Bug 25839] New: Curve25519 Named Curve (Tuesday, 20 May)
• [Bug 25826] The "hash attribute of the algorithm attribute of key" is invalid. There is no hash attribute in the algorithm attribute of key. (Tuesday, 20 May)
• [Bug 25826] New: The "hash attribute of the algorithm attribute of key" is invalid. There is no hash attribute in the algorithm attribute of key. (Tuesday, 20 May)
• [Bug 25820] Should empty key usages be allowed when creating keys? (Tuesday, 20 May)
• [Bug 25820] Should empty key usages be allowed when creating keys? (Tuesday, 20 May)
• [Bug 25820] Should empty key usages be allowed when creating keys? (Tuesday, 20 May)
• [Bug 25820] Should empty key usages be allowed when creating keys? (Tuesday, 20 May)
• [Bug 25820] New: Should empty key usages be allowed when creating keys? (Tuesday, 20 May)
• [Bug 25710] No Key Deletion (Tuesday, 20 May)
• [Bug 25721] extractable keys should be disabled by default (Monday, 19 May)
• [Bug 25819] New: Example of how deriveKey works (Monday, 19 May)
• [Bug 25710] No Key Deletion (Monday, 19 May)
• [Bug 25710] No Key Deletion (Monday, 19 May)
• [Bug 25711] Not clear if keys persist across sessions (Monday, 19 May)
• [Bug 25710] No Key Deletion (Monday, 19 May)
• [Bug 25721] extractable keys should be disabled by default (Monday, 19 May)
• [Bug 25711] Not clear if keys persist across sessions (Monday, 19 May)
• [Bug 25816] New: DH import of PKCS8 uses OperationError instead of DataError for privateKeyInfo parse failure (Monday, 19 May)
• [Bug 25815] Spec encourages unsafe handling of secret data for JWK import of RSA/ECC keys (Monday, 19 May)
• [Bug 25815] New: Spec encourages unsafe handling of secret data for JWK import of RSA/ECC keys (Monday, 19 May)
• [Bug 25799] supercookies (Monday, 19 May)
• [Bug 25799] supercookies (Monday, 19 May)
• [Bug 25799] New: supercookies (Monday, 19 May)
• [Bug 25721] extractable keys should be disabled by default (Monday, 19 May)
• [Bug 25721] extractable keys should be disabled by default (Sunday, 18 May)
• [Bug 25721] extractable keys should be disabled by default (Friday, 16 May)
• [Bug 25721] extractable keys should be disabled by default (Friday, 16 May)
• [Bug 25721] extractable keys should be disabled by default (Friday, 16 May)
• [Bug 25721] extractable keys should be disabled by default (Friday, 16 May)
• [Bug 25721] extractable keys should be disabled by default (Friday, 16 May)
• [Bug 25721] extractable keys should be disabled by default (Friday, 16 May)
• [Bug 25741] RSA-OAEP is under-specified when the parameters define an operation not supported by the key size (Friday, 16 May)
• [Bug 25741] New: RSA-OAEP is under-specified when the parameters define an operation not supported by the key size (Friday, 16 May)
• [Bug 25431] Error names allow RSAES-PKCS1-v1_5 oracle attack against wrapped keys (Friday, 16 May)
• [Bug 25607] Need to advise authors about security considerations (Friday, 16 May)
• [Bug 25721] extractable keys should be disabled by default (Thursday, 15 May)
• [Bug 25721] extractable keys should be disabled by default (Thursday, 15 May)
• [Bug 25711] Not clear if keys persist across sessions (Thursday, 15 May)
• [Bug 25711] Not clear if keys persist across sessions (Thursday, 15 May)
• [Bug 25706] Incomplete Key Generation Definitions (Thursday, 15 May)
• [Bug 25711] Not clear if keys persist across sessions (Thursday, 15 May)
• [Bug 25721] extractable keys should be disabled by default (Thursday, 15 May)
• [Bug 25721] extractable keys should be disabled by default (Thursday, 15 May)
• [Bug 25721] extractable keys should be disabled by default (Thursday, 15 May)
• [Bug 25721] extractable keys should be disabled by default (Thursday, 15 May)
• [Bug 25721] New: extractable keys should be disabled by default (Thursday, 15 May)
• [Bug 25718] New: Support RSA-OAEP with the SHA-2* family of algorithms in JWK (Wednesday, 14 May)
• [Bug 24827] Be clearer about the distinction between operations and methods (Wednesday, 14 May)
• [Bug 25717] New: Provide informative text noting when a parameter in an SPKI/PKCS8/JWK is ignored (Wednesday, 14 May)
• [Bug 23786] Please specify a mapping between WebCrypto AlgorithmIdentifiers and pkcs-1 ones (Wednesday, 14 May)
• [Bug 23786] Please specify a mapping between WebCrypto AlgorithmIdentifiers and pkcs-1 ones (Wednesday, 14 May)
• [Bug 23786] Please specify a mapping between WebCrypto AlgorithmIdentifiers and pkcs-1 ones (Wednesday, 14 May)
• [Bug 24827] Be clearer about the distinction between operations and methods (Wednesday, 14 May)
• [Bug 24827] Be clearer about the distinction between operations and methods (Wednesday, 14 May)
• [Bug 23786] Please specify a mapping between WebCrypto AlgorithmIdentifiers and pkcs-1 ones (Wednesday, 14 May)
• [Bug 25706] Incomplete Key Generation Definitions (Wednesday, 14 May)
• [Bug 25711] Not clear if keys persist across sessions (Wednesday, 14 May)
• [Bug 25710] No Key Deletion (Wednesday, 14 May)
• [Bug 25711] New: Not clear if keys persist across sessions (Wednesday, 14 May)
• [Bug 25710] New: No Key Deletion (Wednesday, 14 May)
• [Bug 25706] New: Incomplete Key Generation Definitions (Wednesday, 14 May)
• [Bug 25431] Error names allow RSAES-PKCS1-v1_5 oracle attack against wrapped keys (Tuesday, 13 May)
• [Bug 25431] Error names allow RSAES-PKCS1-v1_5 oracle attack against wrapped keys (Tuesday, 13 May)
• [Bug 25431] Error names allow RSAES-PKCS1-v1_5 oracle attack against wrapped keys (Tuesday, 13 May)
• [Bug 25431] Error names allow RSAES-PKCS1-v1_5 oracle attack against wrapped keys (Tuesday, 13 May)
• [Bug 25431] Error names allow RSAES-PKCS1-v1_5 oracle attack against wrapped keys (Tuesday, 13 May)
• [Bug 25431] Error names allow RSAES-PKCS1-v1_5 oracle attack against wrapped keys (Tuesday, 13 May)
• [Bug 25431] Error names allow RSAES-PKCS1-v1_5 oracle attack against wrapped keys (Monday, 12 May)
• [Bug 25659] AES-CBC mode does not describe concretely how padding is added (Monday, 12 May)
• [Bug 25659] AES-CBC mode does not describe concretely how padding is added (Monday, 12 May)
• [Bug 25661] New: Allow algorithms to be implemented "as if", rather than strict adherance (Monday, 12 May)
• [Bug 25659] AES-CBC mode does not describe concretely how padding is added (Monday, 12 May)
• [Bug 25659] AES-CBC mode does not describe concretely how padding is added (Monday, 12 May)
• [Bug 25431] Error names allow RSAES-PKCS1-v1_5 oracle attack against wrapped keys (Monday, 12 May)
• [Bug 25387] BigInteger (Monday, 12 May)
• [Bug 25387] BigInteger (Monday, 12 May)
• [Bug 25390] Use [Exposed] in IDL (Monday, 12 May)
• [Bug 25390] Use [Exposed] in IDL (Monday, 12 May)
• [Bug 25658] Need normative reference for ArrayBufferView type (Monday, 12 May)
• [Bug 25388] Boolean arguments (Monday, 12 May)
• [Bug 25387] BigInteger (Monday, 12 May)
• [Bug 25659] New: AES-CBC mode does not describe concretely how padding is added (Monday, 12 May)
• [Bug 25436] Handling of CryptoOperationData needs to be defined (Monday, 12 May)
• [Bug 25626] Convert the various KeyAlgorithm interfaces into Dictionaries (Monday, 12 May)
• [Bug 25658] Need normative reference for ArrayBufferView type (Monday, 12 May)
• [Bug 25658] New: Need normative reference for ArrayBufferView type (Monday, 12 May)
• [Bug 23728] CryptoOperationData can be mutated during operation (Monday, 12 May)
• [Bug 23728] CryptoOperationData can be mutated during operation (Monday, 12 May)
• [Bug 25618] Extensibility: Offer spec-blessed ways to extend the algorithms and curves, rather than monkey-patching the spec (Saturday, 10 May)
• [Bug 25431] Error names allow RSAES-PKCS1-v1_5 oracle attack against wrapped keys (Friday, 9 May)
• [Bug 25387] BigInteger (Friday, 9 May)
• [Bug 25431] Error names allow RSAES-PKCS1-v1_5 oracle attack against wrapped keys (Friday, 9 May)
• [Bug 25627] New: Indicate that Key objects have internal state, and that the attributes they expose are reflections of that internal state (Friday, 9 May)
• [Bug 25626] New: Convert the various KeyAlgorithm interfaces into Dictionaries (Friday, 9 May)
• [Bug 25625] New: Provide a better explanation for the (informative) table in Section 18.1 (Friday, 9 May)
• [Bug 25624] New: Update Promise-using language to reflect the addition of Promises to ES6 (Friday, 9 May)
• [Bug 25623] New: Typographic: Web IDL is two words, not one (Friday, 9 May)
• [Bug 25622] New: Use RangeError instead of QuotaExceededError (Friday, 9 May)
• [Bug 25621] New: Provide better explanation for the concerns of Section 6 (Friday, 9 May)
• [Bug 25620] New: Provide informative text regarding the origin-based security model of the API (Friday, 9 May)
• [Bug 25619] New: Provide (non-normative) explanations for terminology like cryptographic provider (Friday, 9 May)
• [Bug 25618] New: Extensibility: Offer spec-blessed ways to extend the algorithms and curves, rather than monkey-patching the spec (Friday, 9 May)
• [Bug 25607] Need to advise authors about security considerations (Thursday, 8 May)
• [Bug 25607] Need to advise authors about security considerations (Thursday, 8 May)
• [Bug 25607] Need to advise authors about security considerations (Thursday, 8 May)
• [Bug 25607] Need to advise authors about security considerations (Thursday, 8 May)
• [Bug 25607] Need to advise authors about security considerations (Thursday, 8 May)
• [Bug 25607] Need to advise authors about security considerations (Thursday, 8 May)
• [Bug 25607] New: Need to advise authors about security considerations (Thursday, 8 May)
• [Bug 25577] New: The interface name "Key" is very generic (Tuesday, 6 May)
• [Bug 25571] New: Add JOSE mappings for RSA in A.1 (Tuesday, 6 May)
• [Bug 25570] New: Need to register RS1 in Section 21.1 (Tuesday, 6 May)
• [Bug 25569] New: Suggest adding recommended algorithms to Section 18.2 (Tuesday, 6 May)
• [Bug 25558] New: Editorial nits (Monday, 5 May)
• [Bug 25557] New: Spec should allow returning NotSupportedError for reasons other than failed Algorithm normalization (Monday, 5 May)

GALINDO Virginie

• [W3C Web Crypto WG] Web Crypto API Last Call status (27th of may) (Wednesday, 28 May)
• URGENT: Meeting for WebCrypto WG in TPAC at end of October October? (Monday, 26 May)
• RE: Should we do a call Monday re Last Call? (Thursday, 15 May)
• RE: [W3C Web Crypto WG] Security considerations and recommended algorithms bug (Monday, 12 May)
• RE: [W3C Web Crypto WG] Security considerations and recommended algorithms bug (Monday, 12 May)
• RE: [W3C Web Crypto WG] Security considerations and recommended algorithms bug (Monday, 12 May)
• [W3C Web Crypto WG] Security considerations and recommended algorithms bug (Friday, 9 May)
• [W3C Web Crypto] About Payment and Web Crypto intersection (Tuesday, 6 May)
• [W3C Web Crypto WG] minutes of 05th of May call (Monday, 5 May)
• Call is on, if you wanna join.... (Monday, 5 May)
• W3C Web Crypto WG - status (and lets discuss tonight) (Monday, 5 May)

Harry Halpin

• URGENT: Meeting for WebCrypto WG in TPAC at end of October October? (Saturday, 24 May)
• Fwd: W3C Workshop: Web Cryptography Next Steps (Tuesday, 20 May)
• Re: Should we do a call Monday re Last Call? (Thursday, 15 May)
• Re: Should we do a call Monday re Last Call? (Thursday, 15 May)
• Should we do a call Monday re Last Call? (Thursday, 15 May)
• Re: [W3C Web Crypto WG] Security considerations and recommended algorithms bug (Monday, 12 May)
• Re: [W3C Web Crypto WG] Security considerations and recommended algorithms bug (Monday, 12 May)
• Re: [W3C Web Crypto WG] Security considerations and recommended algorithms bug (Monday, 12 May)
• Re: [W3C Web Crypto WG] Security considerations and recommended algorithms bug (Monday, 12 May)
• PROPOSAL: Moving from telecons to a more mailinglist/bugzilla-centric working style (Tuesday, 6 May)
• Minutes from the May 5th telecon (Tuesday, 6 May)

Mark Watson

• OperationError vs DataError (Monday, 19 May)
• Update to Key Discovery draft (Thursday, 15 May)
• Re: Is the "Key" interface name too generic? (Tuesday, 6 May)
• Re: Is the "Key" interface name too generic? (Tuesday, 6 May)

Richard Barnes

• Re: URGENT: Meeting for WebCrypto WG in TPAC at end of October October? (Monday, 26 May)
• Re: Should we do a call Monday re Last Call? (Thursday, 15 May)
• Re: [W3C Web Crypto WG] Security considerations and recommended algorithms bug (Friday, 9 May)
• Re: Is the "Key" interface name too generic? (Tuesday, 6 May)

Ryan Sleevi

• Re: Should we do a call Monday re Last Call? (Thursday, 15 May)
• Re: Should we do a call Monday re Last Call? (Thursday, 15 May)
• Re: [W3C Web Crypto WG] Security considerations and recommended algorithms bug (Monday, 12 May)
• Re: [W3C Web Crypto WG] Security considerations and recommended algorithms bug (Monday, 12 May)
• Re: [W3C Web Crypto WG] Security considerations and recommended algorithms bug (Monday, 12 May)
• Re: Is the "Key" interface name too generic? (Tuesday, 6 May)

조상래

• RE: URGENT: Meeting for WebCrypto WG in TPAC at end of October October? (Tuesday, 27 May)

Last message date: Thursday, 29 May 2014 17:40:47 UTC