W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webcgm-wg@w3.org > January 2009

Re: Disposition of Last Call comments for WebCGM 2.1

From: Bezaire, Benoit <bbezaire@ptc.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 09:19:47 -0500
Message-ID: <D4B91172BD39D64E8799BE7ECB329A5DAA1E32@HQ-MAIL3.ptcnet.ptc.com>
To: <public-webcgm-wg@w3.org>
Hi All,
 
I agree with the WG Resolutions on the following issues:
 
Benoit
 
---
 
[http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcgm-wg/2009Jan/0013.html]
 
Lofton,

I heve updated the Disposition of Last Call comments for WebCGM 2.1, to 
reflect the response status of the I18N comments.
 
http://www.w3.org/Graphics/WebCGM/WG/2008/WebCGM21-LC-comments.html#Issu
e5
<http://www.w3.org/Graphics/WebCGM/WG/2008/WebCGM21-LC-comments.html#Iss
ue5> 
All 6 comments are now marked as [Status: WG Resolution agreed by 
commenter] and I have added the link to their response in each comment.
http://www.w3.org/Graphics/WebCGM/WG/2008/WebCGM21-LC-comments.html#Issu
e5
<http://www.w3.org/Graphics/WebCGM/WG/2008/WebCGM21-LC-comments.html#Iss
ue5> 


Benoit should agree (or disagree ;-) to following.

   1. [LC Review] T.14.4 and T.14.5
 
<http://www.w3.org/Graphics/WebCGM/WG/2008/WebCGM21-LC-comments.html#Iss
ue1
<http://www.w3.org/Graphics/WebCGM/WG/2008/WebCGM21-LC-comments.html#Iss
ue1> >
      [Status: WG Resolution agreed by commenter]
   2. ISSUE: WebCGMRect::union
 
<http://www.w3.org/Graphics/WebCGM/WG/2008/WebCGM21-LC-comments.html#Iss
ue2
<http://www.w3.org/Graphics/WebCGM/WG/2008/WebCGM21-LC-comments.html#Iss
ue2> >
      [Status: WG Resolution sent to commenter/ No response yet]
   3. getObjectExtent() question
 
<http://www.w3.org/Graphics/WebCGM/WG/2008/WebCGM21-LC-comments.html#Iss
ue3
<http://www.w3.org/Graphics/WebCGM/WG/2008/WebCGM21-LC-comments.html#Iss
ue3> >
      [Status: WG Resolution sent to commenter/ No response yet]
   4. More on getObjectExtent()
 
<http://www.w3.org/Graphics/WebCGM/WG/2008/WebCGM21-LC-comments.html#Iss
ue11
<http://www.w3.org/Graphics/WebCGM/WG/2008/WebCGM21-LC-comments.html#Iss
ue11> >
      [Status: WG Resolution sent to commenter/ No response yet]
   5. Question [1of2] about setView() [ Status: WG Resolution sent to
      commenter/ No response yet]
 
<http://www.w3.org/Graphics/WebCGM/WG/2008/WebCGM21-LC-comments.html#Iss
ue12
<http://www.w3.org/Graphics/WebCGM/WG/2008/WebCGM21-LC-comments.html#Iss
ue12> >
   6. Question [2of2] about setView() [Status: WG Resolution sent to
      commenter/ No response yet]
 
<http://www.w3.org/Graphics/WebCGM/WG/2008/WebCGM21-LC-comments.html#Iss
ue13
<http://www.w3.org/Graphics/WebCGM/WG/2008/WebCGM21-LC-comments.html#Iss
ue13> >


This would enable to mark all the above as "WG Resolution agreed by 
commenter", and we could close this document.


Thierry.
Received on Monday, 19 January 2009 14:20:25 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 19 January 2009 14:20:26 GMT