Disposition of Last Call comments for WebCGM 2.1

Lofton,

I heve updated theDisposition of Last Call comments for WebCGM 2.1, to 
reflect the response status of the I18N comments.
  http://www.w3.org/Graphics/WebCGM/WG/2008/WebCGM21-LC-comments.html#Issue5
All 6 comments are now marked as [Status: WG Resolution agreed by 
commenter] and I have added the link to their response in each comment.
http://www.w3.org/Graphics/WebCGM/WG/2008/WebCGM21-LC-comments.html#Issue5


Benoit should agree (or disagree ;-) to following.

   1. [LC Review] T.14.4 and T.14.5
      <http://www.w3.org/Graphics/WebCGM/WG/2008/WebCGM21-LC-comments.html#Issue1>
      [Status: WG Resolution agreed by commenter]
   2. ISSUE: WebCGMRect::union
      <http://www.w3.org/Graphics/WebCGM/WG/2008/WebCGM21-LC-comments.html#Issue2>
      [Status: WG Resolution sent to commenter/ No response yet]
   3. getObjectExtent() question
      <http://www.w3.org/Graphics/WebCGM/WG/2008/WebCGM21-LC-comments.html#Issue3>
      [Status: WG Resolution sent to commenter/ No response yet]
   4. More on getObjectExtent()
      <http://www.w3.org/Graphics/WebCGM/WG/2008/WebCGM21-LC-comments.html#Issue11>
      [Status: WG Resolution sent to commenter/ No response yet]
   5. Question [1of2] about setView() [ Status: WG Resolution sent to
      commenter/ No response yet]
      <http://www.w3.org/Graphics/WebCGM/WG/2008/WebCGM21-LC-comments.html#Issue12>
   6. Question [2of2] about setView() [Status: WG Resolution sent to
      commenter/ No response yet]
      <http://www.w3.org/Graphics/WebCGM/WG/2008/WebCGM21-LC-comments.html#Issue13>


This would enable to mark all the above as "WG Resolution agreed by 
commenter", and we could close this document.


Thierry.