W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webcgm-wg@w3.org > January 2009

Re: post-LC technical threads in the TC

From: David Cruikshank <dvdcruikshank@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 14:35:23 -0800
Message-ID: <8fbe8a40901141435q1940cacnc7cac76c39be80d1@mail.gmail.com>
To: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
Cc: WebCGM WG <public-webcgm-wg@w3.org>
In the case of [2] - initial values, I suspect we threw in the default
values to be in effect when not specified.  Using 'metafile' is probably the
better choice, as Lofton suggests.

thx....Dave

On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 9:59 AM, Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>wrote:

>
> Hi WebCGM WG --
>
> A couple of interesting technical discussions are taking place in the
> WebCGM TC.  The spec-edit token is of course in the WG now, but any changes
> that we make in the WG must eventually be approved back in the TC, once we
> hand the spec back to OASIS.
>
> Therefore it makes sense to ensure that relevant TC input to the
> WG-produced Working Drafts is coordinated in a timely manner (lest we risk
> an extra back-and-forth cycle to come to identical technical specs).
>
> -Lofton.
>
> [1] interior-style SP:
> http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/cgmo-webcgm/200901/msg00019.html
> [2] Initial Values of new 2.1 SPs:
> http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/cgmo-webcgm/200901/msg00034.html
>
>
>
Received on Wednesday, 14 January 2009 22:36:00 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 14 January 2009 22:36:00 GMT