W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webcgm-wg@w3.org > April 2009

re: no telecon tomorrow, Wednesday?

From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 09:02:15 -0600
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20090422090049.05adbe50@localhost>
To: WebCGM WG <public-webcgm-wg@w3.org>
At 09:36 PM 4/21/2009 -0500, Don wrote:
>[...]
>Fine with me, rather use time to work on tests.

Great idea.

Till Monday,
-Lofton.

>  >  WebCGM WG --
>
>  >  Because we are having the 3-day vF2F starting Monday, I'm thinking 
> that we
>  >  can skip the WG-only telecon slot tomorrow morning (Wednesday).
>
>  >  Other thoughts?
>
>  >  For your information, there are a number of small issues that have 
> arisen
>  >  in the TC during TS development.  I will list them here, although 
> most of
>  >  you have already seen them.  We will have WG discussion and 
> resolution at
>  >  the start of the vF2F.
>
>  >  1.) editorial issue with 'scale()' method:
>  >  http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/cgmo-webcgm/200904/msg00051.html
>
>  >  2.) QUESTION: 'maplist' or 'mapList'?
>  >  http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/cgmo-webcgm/200904/msg00066.html
>
>  >  3.) ACI substitution of non-existent font:
>  >  http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/cgmo-webcgm/200904/msg00037.html
>
>  >  4.) getObjectExtent and text (thread splits):
>  >  http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/cgmo-webcgm/200904/msg00077.html
>  >  http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/cgmo-webcgm/200904/msg00078.html
>
>  >  #1, #2, #3 seem to have reached consensus.  If you have any contrary
>  >  opinions, then please send them by email before the weekend.
>
>  >  #4 just came up and is still under discussion -- seeking input from 
> all the
>  >
>  >  implementors (how did they implement the 'boxed-all' Restricted Text
>  >  style?)
>
>  >  Regards,
>  >  -Lofton.
Received on Wednesday, 22 April 2009 15:03:14 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 22 April 2009 15:03:14 GMT