W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webcgm-wg@w3.org > April 2009

re: no telecon tomorrow, Wednesday?

From: Don <dlarson@cgmlarson.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 21:36:10 -0500
To: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>, WebCGM WG <public-webcgm-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <RFpSS0VVWSVJSVZaKCpSMTIzNjE4MTE3MQ@foghorn>
Lofton,

Fine with me, rather use time to work on tests.

Regards,
Don L.
Larson Software Technology
Tel: (713)977.4177 ext. 102
www.cgmlarson.com

 >  WebCGM WG --

 >  Because we are having the 3-day vF2F starting Monday, I'm thinking that we 
 >  can skip the WG-only telecon slot tomorrow morning (Wednesday).

 >  Other thoughts?

 >  For your information, there are a number of small issues that have arisen 
 >  in the TC during TS development.  I will list them here, although most of 
 >  you have already seen them.  We will have WG discussion and resolution at 
 >  the start of the vF2F.

 >  1.) editorial issue with 'scale()' method:
 >  http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/cgmo-webcgm/200904/msg00051.html

 >  2.) QUESTION: 'maplist' or 'mapList'?
 >  http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/cgmo-webcgm/200904/msg00066.html

 >  3.) ACI substitution of non-existent font:
 >  http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/cgmo-webcgm/200904/msg00037.html

 >  4.) getObjectExtent and text (thread splits):
 >  http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/cgmo-webcgm/200904/msg00077.html
 >  http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/cgmo-webcgm/200904/msg00078.html

 >  #1, #2, #3 seem to have reached consensus.  If you have any contrary 
 >  opinions, then please send them by email before the weekend.

 >  #4 just came up and is still under discussion -- seeking input from all the
 >  
 >  implementors (how did they implement the 'boxed-all' Restricted Text
 >  style?)

 >  Regards,
 >  -Lofton.
Received on Wednesday, 22 April 2009 03:12:41 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 22 April 2009 03:12:42 GMT