W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webcgm-wg@w3.org > October 2006

Re: WebCGM 2.0 PR version is available

From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2006 00:18:43 +0200
Message-ID: <9161901.20061003001843@w3.org>
To: "Cruikshank, David W" <david.w.cruikshank@boeing.com>
Cc: "Lofton Henderson" <lofton@rockynet.com>, "WebCGM WG" <public-webcgm-wg@w3.org>

On Monday, October 2, 2006, 7:22:37 PM, David wrote:

CDW> But the OASIS requirement for when we return is that the log reflect
CDW> changes since we transitioned to W3C.  Do we then have to maintain two
CDW> versions of the log?

I wasn't considering that aspect when I responded, just the W3C aspect.

Its fine to keep a longer list of changes, as long as there is a clearly labelled section that lists the changes since entering CR (even if there are zero changes).

CDW> Dave 

CDW> Technical Fellow - Graphics/Digital Data Interchange
CDW> Boeing Commercial Airplane
CDW> 206.544.3560, fax 206.662.3734
CDW> david.w.cruikshank@boeing.com

CDW> -----Original Message-----
CDW> From: Chris Lilley [mailto:chris@w3.org] 
CDW> Sent: Monday, October 02, 2006 10:21 AM
CDW> To: Lofton Henderson
CDW> Subject: Re: WebCGM 2.0 PR version is available

CDW> On Monday, October 2, 2006, 6:36:26 PM, Lofton wrote:

LH>> 2.) Does this seem like a good time to get rid of D.4 [1]?  Does 
LH>> anyone think we should keep that part of the Change Log?  Deleting 
LH>> D.4 would mean that the Change Log would then start at OASIS 1st CS
CDW> / W3C Submission.

CDW> The change log should list changes since the last document transition
CDW> (ie, in this case, since *entering CR*).

CDW> That makes it really short.

 Chris Lilley                    mailto:chris@w3.org
 Interaction Domain Leader
 Co-Chair, W3C SVG Working Group
 W3C Graphics Activity Lead
 Co-Chair, W3C Hypertext CG
Received on Monday, 2 October 2006 22:19:04 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:23:39 UTC