- From: Thierry Michel <tmichel@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2006 22:32:46 +0200
- To: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
- CC: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>, WebCGM WG <public-webcgm-wg@w3.org>
Lofton Henderson wrote: > > Chris, Thierry -- > > As Dave says, it helps us for the next step within OASIS, to have the > Change Log reflect all that has happened since the spec left OASIS. > > Will W3C allow D.2 and D.3 to remain, for that purpose? (D.1 is just > the CR->PR change.) That would be nicer than having to restore the > stuff, when we go back into OASIS. Yes you can leave it in. We will clean it up when moving to REC. > > -Lofton. > > > At 10:22 AM 10/2/2006 -0700, Cruikshank, David W wrote: > >> But the OASIS requirement for when we return is that the log reflect >> changes since we transitioned to W3C. Do we then have to maintain two >> versions of the log? >> >> Dave >> >> >> Technical Fellow - Graphics/Digital Data Interchange >> Boeing Commercial Airplane >> 206.544.3560, fax 206.662.3734 >> david.w.cruikshank@boeing.com >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Chris Lilley [mailto:chris@w3.org] >> Sent: Monday, October 02, 2006 10:21 AM >> To: Lofton Henderson >> Cc: WebCGM WG >> Subject: Re: WebCGM 2.0 PR version is available >> >> >> On Monday, October 2, 2006, 6:36:26 PM, Lofton wrote: >> >> LH> 2.) Does this seem like a good time to get rid of D.4 [1]? Does >> LH> anyone think we should keep that part of the Change Log? Deleting >> LH> D.4 would mean that the Change Log would then start at OASIS 1st CS >> / W3C Submission. >> >> The change log should list changes since the last document transition >> (ie, in this case, since *entering CR*). >> >> That makes it really short. >> >> -- >> Chris Lilley mailto:chris@w3.org >> Interaction Domain Leader >> Co-Chair, W3C SVG Working Group >> W3C Graphics Activity Lead >> Co-Chair, W3C Hypertext CG > > >
Received on Monday, 2 October 2006 20:32:58 UTC