W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webcgm-wg@w3.org > June 2006

Re: unzipping the final LC document

From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
Date: Thu, 08 Jun 2006 06:59:35 -0600
Message-Id: <>
To: Thierry MICHEL <tmichel@w3.org>
Cc: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>,public-webcgm-wg@w3.org

I'm confused...

At 10:51 AM 6/8/2006 +0200, Thierry MICHEL wrote:

>Lofton Henderson wrote:
>But this one should be fixed in
>Broken fragments and their line numbers: They need to be fixed!
>         webcgm_ecma: 488, 500, 543

When I run linkchecker, recursion depth 2, it does not show any errors in 
WebCGM20-ECMA.html.  Furthermore, according to my text editor there are 
only 290 lines in the file.  Furthermore, the whole file is a 'pre' except 
for the first few lines, and the only href are to the standard W3C 
stylesheets (in 'link'), and this:

<p><a href="Overview.html">Up to cover page</a> | <a
href="WebCGM20-Conf.html">Back to Conformance</a> | <a
href="WebCGM20-Appendix.html">On to Appendixes</a></p>

In other words, I cannot find the problem.  You are reporting.  In fact, I 
don't see those reported link errors in -ECMA, even with your line above [1].

HELP!  (Is there a linkchecker bug?)

Furthermore, when I run the checker line of yours [1] above, instead of 
simply running from the linkchecker page with the Web interface, I get some 
broken links/fragments associated with WebCGM20-Profile.html, and this is 
the first time I have *ever* seen these.  Furthermore, when I run your line 
[1] with /current-editor/ instead of /20060608/, I don't see the -Profile 
complaints.  Clearly something is happening that I don't understand, as I 
thought the files in /current-editor/ were the same as /20060608/, except 
for the Overview.html.

Oh well.  I guess we can resolve to advance "...with fixing of link problems".

Received on Thursday, 8 June 2006 13:30:28 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:23:38 UTC