W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webcgm-wg@w3.org > June 2006

Re: process and milestones for moving WebCGM 2.0 to LC.

From: Thierry MICHEL <tmichel@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2006 11:04:23 +0200
Message-ID: <44854517.8040501@w3.org>
To: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
CC: public-webcgm-wg@w3.org

Lofton Henderson wrote:
> Thierry,
> Thanks!  It is a huge help to get the proposed draft letter, as I'm 
> trying to reserve most of my cycles for spec work.
> Questions.  You said earlier that the letter to the Chairs & 
> dependencies need not reference a minutes with resolution to advance to 
> Last Call.  So I can be send it now, e.g., Monday or Tuesday?  That is, 
> we don't need to discuss / approve it during a WG teleconference, 
> correct?  (Although I'm happy to have any feedback that any WG-ers might 
> have.)

Yes there is no request to reference a minutes with resolution to 
advance to LC for this email.
It is mandatory in the *Transition Request*.
Feel free to remove if necessary.

> More embedded...
> At 11:27 AM 6/3/2006 +0200, Thierry MICHEL wrote:
>> Lofton Henderson wrote:

>> and copy WG with dependencies.
> Is there a master list of all WG email addresses for the latter, so that 
> I can just extract the half-dozen addresses we need?  Or should I go to 
> each of the WG pages to find the addresses?
>> -------------------------------------------------
>> Hello chairs, Hypertext Coordination Group.
>> We are explicitly seeking feedback from the following W3C Groups on this
>> document:
> I would suggest instead:  "The WebCGM WG Charter [4] lists these groups 
> for coordination, and we specifically seek their feedback:
> [4] http://www.w3.org/2006/03/webcgm-charter.html#coordination
> [I like the idea to mention the charter and point to it.]

that is fine.

Thierry Michel
Received on Tuesday, 6 June 2006 09:04:42 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:19:08 GMT