W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webcgm-wg@w3.org > July 2006

Re: WebCGM 2.0 Implementation Report and Test Suite.

From: Thierry MICHEL <tmichel@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 14:27:00 +0200
Message-ID: <44C75F94.7060201@w3.org>
To: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
CC: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>, WebCGM WG <public-webcgm-wg@w3.org>

Chris Lilley wrote:
> On Wednesday, July 26, 2006, 10:07:07 AM, Thierry wrote:
> 
> 
> TM> Lofton,
> 
> 
> TM> I have edited and published the following on the W3C site:
> 
> 
> TM> WebCGM 2.0 Implementation Report
> TM> http://www.w3.org/2006/Graphics/WebCGM/implementation-report.html
> 
> 
> TM> WebCGM 2.0 Test Suite
> TM> http://www.w3.org/2006/Graphics/WebCGM/testsuite.html
> 
> I suggest adding, right after 
> 
> This Test Suite does not cover all WebCGM 2.0 features. It only covers the new DOM-related and XCF features, and the new static and "intelligence" features -- the 2.0 additions to WebCGM 1.0.
> 
> the following
> 
> WebCGM 2.0 implementations are therefore expected also to pass the WebCGM 1.0 test suite.


Done . Good catch.
> 
> The reason that I want this to be explicit is to allay any concerns over 'delta specifications'.
sure.


The imlplementation reports only the  new features introduced in WebCGM 2.0.

I guess the new features in WebCGM do not impact Web CGM 1.0.


Should we also add your statement in the CR exit criteria ?
> 
> 
> 
> 


-- 
Thierry Michel
W3C
Received on Wednesday, 26 July 2006 12:27:09 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:19:09 GMT