W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > October to December 2012

Re: [admin] XHR ED Boilerplate

From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 21:08:11 +0000 (UTC)
To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
cc: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>, public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1211262107330.29456@ps20323.dreamhostps.com>
On Mon, 26 Nov 2012, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> I agree with Ian's other observations/comments.
> On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 10:22 PM, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> wrote:
> > What I don't really understand, though, is why any of this is needed 
> > at all. What value is the W3C adding by creating these forks?
> In the end (dunno when that will be), patent commitments from the 
> Members of the WebApps WG. That seems worthwhile to me. It is 
> unfortunate I could not reach an agreement with the W3C where I could 
> publish my work under CC0 and still achieve that.

I'm all in favour of that, but if that's the goal, there's no point the WG 
doing anything until there's something that could actually go to REC, IMHO.

Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Monday, 26 November 2012 21:08:34 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 27 October 2017 07:26:50 UTC