W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > October to December 2012

Re: Two years on and still no sensible web storage solutions exist

From: Kyle Huey <me@kylehuey.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2012 06:49:06 -0800
Message-ID: <CAP045AoPb02V7Zn+3MDVyNUDBU582Xi=eNg4b6GeXsS7KSfsvg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Florian Bösch <pyalot@gmail.com>
Cc: Charles McCathie Nevile <chaals@yandex-team.ru>, Andrew Wilson <atwilson@google.com>, Todd Blanchard <toddvblanchard@gmail.com>, Webapps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 4:30 AM, Florian Bösch <pyalot@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 1:12 PM, Charles McCathie Nevile <
> chaals@yandex-team.ru> wrote:
>
>> The Webapps group will continue to try and reach industry agreement on
>> ways to handle data storage for offline applications. Help is appreciated.
>> Trying to help is generally appreciated too.
>>
> A slight tangent, but coming from WebGL where we're dealing with a lot of
> binary data, the inability of WebSQL and IndexedDB to deal with Array
> Buffers is quite an obstacle.
>

Er, IndexedDB should handle ArrayBuffers just fine.  If you're seeing
problems with that that's an implementation bug, not a case that the spec
failed to handle.

- Kyle
Received on Monday, 12 November 2012 14:49:33 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:56 GMT